General Forum

huh?

n/a

This tired old argument? Shit. If they tried to do this guys would simply created screen names to be assholes with and other names to be innocent.

i've wondered about such things. wondered if some guy may post an occasional asshole comment toward someone just so he can counter that asshole comment he made himself with a screen name he's known by so as to appear much better by comparison. sock puppet theatre wherein he plays both the villain and the hero as it were.

duh....

i already posted about it a while ago and asked opinions, but there were only few responses agreed that it would be usefull, and everyone said it's too easy to use another unknown screen name (just to give some sh*t in forum) so i'm afraid that nobody really cares :(

Since I'm new here, I didn't realize the matter had been addressed, and judging by the first reply by "b-o-r-i-n-g" (which I gather is neither his real name, nor a self-description), it has no doubt been discussed to the point of boredom.

Even though guys would find other means to appear under a different guise (guys in disguise; good name for a band), I would still make the case for CC disallowing it, because at the very least it would winnow out those too lazy or not sufficiently obsessed with deception (ironically, mostly their own) to go through the trouble of re-registering, etc.. leaving only the most egregious offenders, whose style, manner, etc. would quickly unmask their true identities and disabuse them of their "more-clever-than-thou" conceit. At that point they could decide to join the rest of us in an honest discussion of ideas, or leave.

Don't you just LOVE it when a newbie thinks they found a new problem or a unique side-angle to get around them? ROTFLMFAO

a lot more then the fools who like to make a stupid comment like yours

Mr. Blane, I never said I found a new problem, nor do I think I have a "unique side-angle." I simply posed the question and offered my opinion. Have you anything to bring to the table besides your dismissive and mocking sarcasm?

n/a

but it does not seem like it will ever happen. It has been mentioned here more times then I can remember... yet never changes. Of course there are ways to do it... but welcome to reality of no names

Perhaps not, but do you think it SHOULD happen? Has anyone wrtten CC? If so, what was their response? They have always been pretty responsive to my queries. They have not always responded in the affirmative, but they have always responded--and almost always in a thoughtful way.

They are VERY responsive and VERY hands-off in the forums. Unless they are responding to specific individual complaints or violations of guidelines.

Since your passport does not say "Melomane" you have no complaint about anonymous posting because you are totally anonymous now.

I have an idea. to show how really brave we are instead of hiding behind nicknames let's all post our real names, addresses, photos and contact information!

to think that somehow using screen names brings this porn forum nobility, maturity and bravery is absurd....though it does bring the porn forum a certain level of pomposity, conceit, egotism, lying, delusion, and yes even adolesence, cowardness and bullying behavior.

this is alice in wonderland whether one uses screenames, nicknames or no name. For you to believe because you have created some porn forum persona "Melomane" you are somehow, more noble or brave or mature is a bit absurd and sad.

Maybe when you take a good look in the mirror as Bela70 did you will realize this is an Alice in Wonderland porn forum not a noble democratic civic forum and turn away.

"Whatever," I think I understand the nature of this place as well as you. But I see your intention is not to answer the question posed, but but rather to characture my position with absurdly overblow aspects that are not, in fact, what I mean. My postion is "absurd" only as seen through your deliberately distorted rendering.

your question was asked and answered...you just may not like the answer.

If you answered the question at all, you did so rather obliquely. It’s clear that answering the question directly and in a spirit of good will is not your purpose here. Your purpose is to attack me personally, rather than offer your opinion or a reasoned argument to persuade me that my suggestion will not work or is simply untenable. I will grant that you are consistent in one regard (your hostility), for every time you reply to me, you seem to be in a fit of near rage—‘seeing red’ as it were---which of course handicaps your ability to see clearly and evaluate an argument calmly, coolly and fairly. You obviously have a decent mind, but every time you reply to me it appears that its analytical capacity is short-circuited by your spleen.

Whether I “like” your answer or not is not germane to the discussion. What is germane is whether I and other Forum members are persuaded by your argument. I, for one, am not. The most generous assessment I can make of your reply is that it is not primarily a function of your hostile disposition, but a simple failure of logic and concrete example of your spleen overriding your intellect. To say that an action or intention is not noble does not mean the absence of such an action or intention in a subject is therefore noble. Likewise, a man may commit a cowardly act, but it does not follow that if he does not commit such an act that he is brave. While it is true that one of the marks of bravery is the absence of cowardice, this absence alone does not constitute bravery, for a brave action is a thing in-and-of itself, and absence of cowardice is neither the cause of nor proof of bravery. The same can be said about the relation of adolescent behavior to maturity, etc.

A less generous, and I suspect more accurate, assessment of your reply is that you understand full well that the absence of cowardice is not bravery, etc., but you intentionally ascribe a position to me that you know I am not taking. I quite agree with you, to assume that “using screen names brings this porn forum nobility, maturity and bravery is absurd.” However, I never said that. You put words in my mouth, giving an altogether false rendering of my argument. In other words, you set up your straw man then cut him down. (Now that is a cowardly act!) How clever; but sadder than clever. Create your straw man, cut him down, then sit back and enjoy that momentary spark of perverse pleasure you derive from your unacknowledged, solitary victory.

How sad that you seem ever intent on attempting to make others look like fools, so you can feel superior, presiding contemptuously above it all. You duck in and out of this Forum under different names, spewing your vitriol everywhere, making pronouncements like some self-appointed judge, enumerating everyone’s flaws, and contemptuously mocking those whom you regard as your inferiors (everyone), reserving special contempt for anyone you think just might be your intellectual equal (or superior). You then deign to counsel all those who are, to your mind, self-deceived. Not surprisingly that is everyone, for you alone can “see” the truth. You alone suffer no illusions about the true nature of this place, the innermost workings of the minds and hearts of others, indeed reality itself. A veritable seer in our midst, you are a modern day Tieresias! Let us all offer sacrifice and libations to the gods and pray you never leave us, leaving us without the benefit of your wise counsel and protection, leaving us prey to the seductive chimera that lurk here in CC and the snares of those malicious gods, whose malice makes even your own seem mild.

You counsel me to look in the mirror, reporting that Bela70 benefited from doing so. I know nothing of what Bela70 may or may not have learned from looking in the mirror, but I sincerely hope that he did not do so at your behest. Or, if he did gain something thereby, it could only have been in spite of and not because of your goading. Perhaps a few have been persuaded to examine themselves after your presumptuous judgments of them, but I think the majority here can see through your agenda. And how remarkably ironic that you should accuse me of “bullying!” Lol! Indeed I invite Forum members to examine my posts and yours (though for yours it will be a bit more difficult since you frequently change your name) and see for themselves who the bully is. See if they don’t likewise conclude that the string of attributes you ascribe to me---“ pomposity, conceit, egotism, lying, delusion, and yes even adolesence [sic], cowardness [sic] and bullying behavior”---are nothing more than a projection of your own. For that reason I will not presume, as you do in my regard, to tell you to look in the mirror, for it would do no good, as is made plain by the way you deport yourself here. I would think you might profit from doing so if I saw any evidence to persuade me. However, your consistently arrogant, presumptuous and condescending judgments of others, your readiness to point out their flaws and habit of meting out prescriptions for what they must do to correct their errors in judgment and partake, in part at least, of your enlightened vision of reality, which only you possess in full measure, make it unlikely that you possess the capacity for humbly evaluating your own flaws, it being so much easier to project them onto others. Now that is what I call Alice in Wonderland!

Finally, to return to the original question, I agree with you that this place is a porn forum, but I don’t see how that fact and my suggestion are mutually exclusive. I am not suggesting, nor do I think it is a good idea that members reveal their real names. I think a measure of anonymity is a good and probably necessary thing (a point you humorously make with your sardonic caricature of my alleged belief that the more we reveal the braver we are). However, I think once one takes a name here, one should be willing to write under that name. Perhaps there are some legitimate reasons to deviate from this, but I think the reasons for using the chosen screen name far outweigh any benefits that might derive from doing otherwise. Again, I quite agree with you, instituting such a rule will not transform this Forum into a “noble, democratic, civic forum.” Nor will members, by reason of writing under one name be rendered “nobler, braver or more mature.” But again, I made no such claims. These are claims you falsely suggest I made. One may not be able to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear. This is a porn forum, ok. Even so, I see no reason to believe that the Forum, by reason of its nature as a porn forum, can admit of no improvement. Its essential nature may not change, and I am in no way suggesting it could or should. The decorum surrounding it is another matter. That can and should be changed. It wouldn’t hurt to try. At the very least, we would discover if it works or not and finally get the answer to this unanswered question.

Could you repeat that?

btw,, numbers..that is the way to lessen the impact of egotistical posters such as yourself.

n/a

quit hiding mehind your moniker, let's see your real name and address and telephone number so you can be held accountable, you hypocritical phony

Sure... still waiting for that ccMail from you, AC. ;)


TNTWAHTLL

that would hold us all accountable, our ccmail boxes flooded with threats from anonomous tnt!....get a life, try something other than being known as a persona on a porn site

Pretty funny rejoinder. It has the additional merit of not being tinged with your usual hostility. Of course you could not leave it at that; it's not in your nature. You had to take a swipe before running away. Wasn't it Cicero who said, "When you have no case, attack the plaintiff."

You pay me an unintended compliment in assuming I have any "impact" at all here. I suffer no such illusion, but I am confidnt of at least one thing: Unlike you, I do not come to this Forum with a malicious disposition, ready to piss in peoples' faces, then hastily run away.

No, he has a MUCH clearer view of reality here than you do.

n/a

and how do I contact you and make you accountable when you ahve said something abusrd? a cc mail? Wow! that is brave!

Braver than some it seems ;) Anyone would think you don't want me to know who these spineless wonders are? Of course I couldn't possibly bundle you in with those naysayers now could I? ;)

TNTNAFTBF

Really now, who the hell are you?

and how are you held accountable naked? I know it must feel good that you perceive you are going out on a limb willing to withstand the slings and arrows of an anonomous mob......but get a grip you are part of the anonomous mob, maybe a small step below the anonomous "mob" because you live under the ego enhancing delusion that your nickname somehow gives you an identity.

no one is accountable here other than to their credit card company.

Yes I think they should bring in this rule. While it would be easy for someone to create a new name to be an arsehole, unless they could be bothered to create numerous aliases, at least we would all know they are the same arsehole and we could then choose to ignore their posts.

Oops managed to hit post before I had finished.
CC admin do read the forums. EMailing them directly is appropriate when the matter is specific to the individual but more general issues such as this are better aired here. CC has always tried to keep this forum as open as possible and does not interfere unless posts are too extreme or abusive. I prefer that it stays that way rather than risk it becoming over regulated. Another point is that this is the general forum and is open to non-members (who do not have screen names) to post.

Always wondered why that advice wasn't really more appreciated by most.
You read a nasty message, you ignore it. End of story.
I agree that trying to regulate people into good behavior isn't the best idea. Even if it were to result in a bump up in the civility of the forums, it would seem a hollow kind of civility, wouldn't it?
Better I think that those who know better, just take the high road and not give such posts a second thought. Turn the other cheek and be an example themselves of the kind of discourse they want rather than moan about the things other people say or how they say them.

Which is why I just ignore any poster that replies to my posts or any poster who pretends to be me. If they could even put a little bit of thought, humour or intelligence into there replies or pretend posts it might be worth my while reading . But they don't.

It amuses me though to know that they are completely wasting their time and effort.

I can---cool

n/a

HOpe, you've been fine. Thank you for the notes before. Take Care!
HotAsianPie

n/a

Sorry, are you in USA now, if I got you right* ? LOL I'm not sure if we can ever talk, because it seems our schedules times don't coincide. Thank you for the note :) If you like, here's my ya-hooo! ID---> miababe_notpie. Good Luck to YOU too ;)

When salesmenship and marketing fail try bullying the customer. Used cars, furniture, men's suits, gym memberships and cam girls. Whatever it takes to get you paying. They would prefer you just gave them the money outright but if they have to do a video to get it then ok. If you insist.

don't forget time-shares

great song--have you heard john cougar mellencamp play that song, its good too

One host I knew gained a lot of self-confidence and her English got a lot better. Unfortunately, she stayed too long and grew very jaded and bitter.

I believe most members who come here lie. They do not reveal themselves to host via a cam so they lie about their age and their physical appearance. If they need to send a pic they can get one in a few minutes from Hotornot. Just pick an image of a young man who had a lot of votes and was considered hot to the ladies and pretend it is your own picture. They create an image of a young, handsome, hip guy who comes to CC because he just broke up with his gf, or his job or school is keeping him too busy to date, or he stumbled on the site and he thinks the girls here are bright and beautiful and oh so cool (he peppers his speech with youthful expressions) All bullshit designed to get the host to think of him as a friend, a peer, a cool guy. Not some old fart. The idea is to get a better show, a cheaper or free show, and get into the host's head. That is the image he is pushing to the host. His image of himself is never in question. He is a failure socially, emotionally and ethically. That doesnt stop him for a second.

I don't "give cam" because she's not paying. Plus why show my messy living room and if I am pleasuring myself I only let a girl see that if she is next to me in reality.

Professor, You raise yet another interesting question and aspect of the complicated psychology that motivates people to come here. So, it is your considered opinion that "most" guests lie about their age, image, etc.? Frankly, I haven't given this aspect of it much thought, but I don't doubt what you say is true, if not for "most," at least for some guests. What we have here then, among other things, is a cyber-masquerade fantasy ball. Which raises a question that has occured to me: Since it appears to be the case that many people post messages here using different names, why doesn't CC require that all participants use their screen name, or not be allowed to post? At the very least it would stop this silly and cowardly adolescent practice of hiding behind a different mask in order to attack someone. Perhaps I'll post the question to the Forum. I suspect the cowards who hide behind various pseudonyms will object; those who do not will be in favor.

and why do you think posting under one's screename is any less of a lie?

Valid point, "???/".Granted, the screen name in-and-of-itself is a pseudonym. And I'll take your point a step further: Even in the 'real' world we all wear masks. In fact, the word "person" comes from the Latin, "persona", meaning "mask." That said, I still maintain that requiring the use of the real screen name would remove a layer of subterfuge---if not entirely, at least significantly---and the Forum would be a better place for it. Even knowing there will always be those whose principal aim here is to dissemble, would anyone here argue that the Forum would not be improved by their absence?

I disagree...requiring the screename will give, for people like you, an illusion of there being less subterfuge, of there being more order. I say revel in the illusion, in the anonymity, in the chaos.

why not go th other way and instead prohinit anyone from posting under their screename, then all the fake personalities, puffed up personas, personal melodramas would be gone, for example for each post thread you would be given a number.....we'd have to discuss ideas I know the egoists here who have created their little fantasy world where they are the super hero or kindly mentor would be no more.

But then people would just post their name in their message. If they didn't it would be almost impossible to follow a thread. It would also make it impossible to ignore the posts of the people you dislike.

I think I would have to go with Melomane's idea rather than yours.

no, every thread, you'd be be givena number..that would remain your number thru that thread.....you could then follow that person's thought process and responses through the thread.

Yes for those posters who need to create a persona they could put their name in the body of the message. but then they would have to do that thru every thread ad peoplewould have toa ctually read the message to find out who it was from....tiring for poster and reader. Im not proposing this as an idea that would fly. because these forums are dominated by the perosnalities that have been created here, their egos couldnt stand it if they were reduced to numbers, the role of their fictional personas reduced and ideas discussed instead. That is why I dont think melon name's ideas when you come down to it don't have much to do about lifting the standard of this porn forum, decorum, nasty posts, adolescent posts (you will have plenty of that even if you can only post with screename....some of the most juvenile posts come from people with screenames..and dont get me started on accountability! lol)...what he and others are really concerned about is the danger the anonomous posts place on their well crafted, ego-centric porn forum personas.

n/a

Dear Ms. "bla," Just as you are welcome here, you are welcome to leave. I assume nobody has forced you here against your will. If you find this conversation boring, by all means look for one that you find more to your taste.

n/a

Bla your right! :)
This is a place for fun
between consenting adults!
As with anything, a little caution is wise ;)

This is a place for members to indulge their sex addiction and for hosts to fester their greed. Fun is only fleeting and illusionary. Next time you are all together stand up and tell all you friends and family about all the fun you are having here. Go into detail. See how happy they are for you. If you can't share your fun what kind of fun is it?

You will notice how simple I see life!
That is how a life should be lived!
I used to make things so complicated and hard!
Professor it is too bad you can't see this!
Also you don't make sense!
Read what you wrote again.
Would you then tell all your private life
to family and friends?????
Its nobody's rats petunia what happens
in a persons private life!
There I will get off the soapbox now ;)
Who's next? :P

You state that you have the same right to post as Melomane while previously you told him not to post. Surely he has the same right to post as you ? As he said, if you find his posts boring they are clearly labelled so just pass on by without reading them if you do not like them.

This self-contradictory reply is amusing. Bla, is put off by the question and ensuing discussion, yet he (or she) comes here and reads them. It reminds me of the old lady who calls the police to report an indecent exposure. When the police officer comes to her door, he asks for the specifics. She said, "Just ;look out that window, you'll see it." The officer does so, but responds, "Lady, I don't see anyone, " to which she replies, "Stand on that chair. You'll see what I'm talking about."

You say, "Excuse me, I have the wrong number," then rush headlong to the vomitorium. :)

hmmm-- I say those look cool

Hey Chaser, Go for them! Different strokes (no pun intended) for different folks. For my part, I find these huge melon-tits (fake or real) grotesque, and one of the most off-putting, unerotic and all-too-common (in both senses) images here is the picture of a woman sucking one of her gargantuan mammaries. But hey, one man's delight is another man's disgust. Bon appetite!

thanks--cool
and no fun intended-thats cool

amazinggirl?

What do you mean?

dense?

just send me a pc ! no lectures ok !

n/a

n/a

u are so cutw with out much, i think he means just do normal as u would, if going out

n/a

but dear cara.... with you i am in love...

Oh, but dear.... the thought of you naked is sooooooo appealing

I have seen her naked many times............I feel sorry for you

yes ladies--thats good advice, i agree with dave, my grandmother never wore make up and she was a beautiful woman , if it wasnt for her, my mother wouldnt had been born, than I wouldnt had, and the story goes on and I dont know what in the heck I am saying, so go ahead and put all the make up you want, wear it well, you do look good--cool

one fan got jealous of another one and decided to touch him! haha

n/a

n/a

Makeup is toxic, you know. Full of carcinogens and junk.
Give it up, ladies. Before it's too late.

n/a

all natural! no need to put tons of makeup on... natural beauty is much nicer! for those who like to use it... the best advice was above... like you are going out for the night to dinner or a club

n/a

Kaz u aways look gr8 Hun. Doubt they'll be pics of me without the slap LOL...I love Make-Up, and Love Dressing Up on Cam part of the fun 4 me, would indeed feel naked without it, and I dont recall seeing Cat Woman without any slap on, the roleplays I do definately require Make-up !!!

i love wearing make up too! and "fuck me" pumps! weeeeeeeee!

lollies=))

n/a

n/a

For many members those words are poison and they will pass that host by and never return. I do think many use it when sleeping. If a host is not willing to make small talk before a video then she is not worth seeing. Maybe members should have hosts strip first and then we can look them over before we decide to pay or not. How would that work girls?

n/a

Well (another strange anon) that is exactly how it works in Instant Action, NAKED..check the goods over immediately. I always have the following message on my screen LIVE CAM ONLY. Why ? because im naked, playing etc etc, do I really want 2 stop and chit chat idly ?? NO, I havent enough hands, and YES I do have handsfree stimulators. As for this message putting Many viewers off, thats nonsense ? where the hell you get that sort of idea xx LOL ps.I do my chit chatting in the Com Room. (when Im free)

n/a

it's kind of true for me that reading such a message is a putoff. even in instant action, i at least want to get a general sense of the personality behind the yum yum's before i go to vid. it's been my experience that jumping into vid with a host without some kind of vibe going can often turn into kind of bummer.
for a host who expects only to be visited by regulars, i can understand such a message, but if she's hoping for new members, i can see it as being an obstacle.

n/a

maybe kaz u dont have to work on cc and u do it on ure free time while i;m sure 80% of girls on cc ( most from east europe)have to work here while preparing for smth better in their lives (working while in university or as a second job cause the one in reality pays lil ). and trust me the soon we hear the video our head gets clear and ready for the video , is the main reason we are on cc .
and as far as members are concerned they re not forced in any way to enter the video. they have the pics to judge if they d like a girl and the profile as a test of their english and most girls are sweet in video . if girls behave bad is outside video when guys thend to get on their nerves "for free ";)
surely small talk is fine and can help get the show one wants . and indeed if one has special requirments he shouldnt try video directly , for these guys there are many other girls .
but to also be totally honest 60% of customers with real desire to video they enter video without the small talk. i got to understand that a guy who just chats for more than 15 mins wont ever enter vid.

n/a

n/a

Yes, a host "should" textchat, especially since cc is famous for that. But as a member I respect that some are here only to do videis and make money. That irritates me as well, but I would much rather they put "VIDEO ONLY" in their profile pages and on the chatscreen so I don't waste my time with them.

n/a

True enough. Instead of sleeping or cleaning house they should be trolling newsgroups, etc. developing customers.

wow--what ever happen to the old fashion way, when meeting women.
If the real world out there had this same attitude about video only, lets just all carry a pocket size computer and log on and just watch videos and no chatting before. I know this is a site to make money for you sweeties and thats ok for stating your opionion, but lets face it the old fashion ways will get you more video's. Oh by the way Ema I like your attitude and honesty-thats cool, good luck and best wishes in your studies.
P.S. and on the note above about what ever happen to old fashion ways on meeting women, by grandfather use to say that all the times, it doesnt work for me to well--just some advice to some I quess-cool

Some people in the "real world" DO have that attitude.

The girls here are performers and in that sense the same "professional" attitude is found in strippers, who perform a similar service for us.

The fun part is that many many hosts don't consider themselves "professional" and will happily chatter away before, after and sometimes in lieu of video.

n/a

But...I would think, u know who those members are, and control the situation

ema, u make a good point, but also remember that is only u, u cant say all host, wake ready to go, i have tried that with some, just cause was interested, and the one i went to visit, was sleeping, and said...can u come back...yea right...why even be online, if when come in video, u ask, can u come back in 4 hours...so yes, it does hurt the hosts, that might be studying

well said

n/a

thats cool-I understand you

just tell them "busy" and the polite ones quickly leave and try later

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes I agree totally. There are too many cheap people on this site who want everything for free. I also agree that the ones who sit in your text chat for hours are very unlikely to ever video with you.

This site is full of losers like that.

n/a

good grief host---members come in to help girls earn money, they are not lonely, if you dont want the help, just say so, we find another host that does

n/a

Sigh.... If I had a nickel for each English paper I've written for a university-going host here...

n/a

it is ok to chat for free if the topics are non sexual... but if you get someone in you text chat asking things they can wank to... well then no need to waste your time... the cheap ones might just be reading your words looking at your pics... and it is good enough for them. so you just spent an hour talking to them, hoping that you will get some $ from them... but in the end they have cum and gone... and no vid

I dont have one. Seriously. I dont. Freaks people out at the beach.

It may not be easily visible but I assure you, you have one.

Not when it was surgically removed.

n/a

I use my belly button for a can holder-cool

Because life would be boring if it wasn't complicated and as a result we would still be living in caves and hunting with rocks.

n/a

More importantly ....why do dogs have black lips???

Life is a succession of lessons, which must be lived to be understood.
/R.W.Emerson/

Not much point living if it wasn't a challenge :p

I don't agree - but thinking too much complicates things - rely on intuition for most things and logic in a crisis

Yeah yeah. But for the love of God. Why do dogs have black lips. Help me. Somebody help me?

wasnt complicated before you started seeing freeda !

Mondo has a good question, before I was going to give my comment, I stop for a minute and just realize what Mondo's wife above just said-now I dont have a comment--
P.S. Mondo-cheers, bless you and good luck figuring it out-cool

n/a

Both very good kaz.

That was the Hokey Pokey though ;)

n/a

Well its both really.. I guess I should look it up before I think I know everything. ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hokey_Pokey

a reasonable voice! see "stripsearch" no need to protect all female hosts, they arent hyper-sensitive to perceived sleights and have a sense of humor!

ok:P

n/a

You may want to check the Jan 21 post with the same title in the viewers forum. If it's correct then she won't be coming back.

yep your right i guess she wont be back .......looks like she fell in love !!!!!! lucky guy i used to have a great time with her lol's ..so i need to find me a new wanking partner i guess .HELP PLSSSSSSS

ohhh how I Love Tennis, see me this Year at Wimbledon, Il be in the Woomble outfit -Tobermory xx Cheering from Henman Hill x

snoooorrrrrreeeee

Great final! Bring on the French Open

I'll bring the strawberries & cream, jiggly :). See you on the hill

The guy is perhaps the best ever...

"Guy" being the operative word, of course.
Put that skinny little pecker up against Serena Williams and he'd be manhandled something fierce.

No chance... Federer blew Roddick of the court and he has the fastest serve in the world.... The women players are practically fucked after two sets.

Yeah, well, pit Serena against Federer in an arm-wrestling match, and I know who I'd bet my money on.

What tennis needs is an injection of personality and a return to wooden rackets. The men's side especailly.
Saw a replay of an old match between McEnroe and Connors on ESPN Classic a while ago - now THAT was entertainment.

You cannot........be serious!!!!!

Yet Federer offers a far higher quality of tennis than either McEnroe or Connors combined. To watch him play is to watch a master at work ... effortless tennis and enjoyable too.
I never tire of watching him and hope he's on form for the rest of the year.

He'd take Serena easily in 2 sets - I'd let her play best of 3 so she doesn't get fatigued.

At least you did not try the "I am having trouble with my video scam. Would you enter my video and see if it is working for you.?" I always say sure. Log off. Set it for free video and I will let you know. Of course that never happens.

We must attract completely different types of host then wow as I have been asked the same thing a few times and the video has always been free.

cool---what type of fun you like

hello my new/old friend.always fun when you are around!

will the self promotion never end?

in other words she wants him to ask her and this is her way of a "subtle" hint..stupid bint

thats cool anne--best wishes-kisses

n/a

she has a private life! so does bela70 but they are publicity hounds......why constantly announce, about their private life on a public porn forum! then complain when people comment about it, some negatively!

re-read her post... sounds like a lot of people are hounding her about their relationship and instead of replying to a large number... she made one general response to all. Big deal, let it go, and enjoy your time instead of worrying why someone else posts!

read imshy's response..she could ahve answered her supposed emails that were hounding her with a group email instead she posts on a public porn forum because she, like bela70, are addicted to being publicity hounds.

you posters complaining crack me up!!you say they are just promoting,seeking publicity yet you post in response.all you are doing is giving it life,feeding them.if you don't like their posts don't respond.if there are not many replies most people will read & move on but the more responses there are the more time you give others to form an opinion especially when you are insulting.but you can't leave posts alone because although you are feeding them it in turn creates food for you.TROLL FOOD!!

of course what i am doing in my previous post is exactly the same thing that I am complaining about, giving the post even more than its deserved 15 seconds of fame...ok i admit it im a bit idiotic at times

hey troll i NEVER complained about th OP just the hypocriscy of you trolls!!

and you continue to give the post life...take your own advice.

but simple one i NEVER about it,you trolls did!

i disagree with you novids, this isnt the kind of publicity tom cruise and katie homes want...they want 5-10 posts of the "isnt this sweet" "best of luck to you two" variety (which is what they would have got if people followed your advice). instead her declaration of love is getting the same treat ment that tom cruise got jumping on a sofa on oprah...and well deserved it is.

i NEVER said they wanted the publicity.That is what the trolls said,i just pointed out their hypocrisy in giving them more publicity.remember they say there is no such thing as bad publicity.look at paris hilton for example

they do want publicity, nice sweet publicity, they dont want to hear that they are self-promoting, self-obsessed...calling them on their shallowness...if you think they are happy having to face themselves in that mirror you are delusional.

thats about 6 different names you have used in this post.who's that walking across your bridge!

its the billygoat on the bridge, the troll is underneth the bridge

Yes and he said - who's that walking across your bridge. Not that you (the troll) was walking across the bridge.

so what? you use one name and your numerous posts are only worth reading for the unintentional laugh factor.

Where as your posts are not even worth reading.

Very true novids4me.

I suppose if I was a loser in life I would also have to find a way to vent my frustrations just like these trolls do.

all these nicks wiv no names are shit stirrers, nothing better 2 do than moan and be nasty, Jesus GET OUT MORE and stop taking it so dam seriously, see it 4 what it is. and who cares who Bela is, far as Im concerned its that Yellow Tweenie. (Cbeebies)

Unfortunately for them this place is their life.

I liked the Tweenies idea though.

from abc, the resident long term poster....lives here day and night...pick any day over the last year and you will find an abc hypocritical post

dont think that was abc.you been suckered dude,its one of the trolls!

that was me novids4me

If you people suspect other people of trolling just to stir the shit, why do you give them exactly what it is you think they want?
If it's something you can't stand, that especially seems like something kinda retarded to do.
Unless you're, like, "anit-troll" trolls, or something. If that's the case, then, wow, that's, like, pretty deep.

u have no idea how deep these anti-trolls have gone, suffice it to say as deep as abc's recent colonoscopy

n/a

Oh's nothing that has not been seen before ;) It just not as interesting this time round in my opinion :P Always been a case of quality over quantity anyways.

TNTSAIYBKI

I wish u both all the best for Ur future!

unless i missed a shit load of posts here when did anyone ever ask about it...and i highly doubt u got "many emails" askin bout it as no one here gives a damn anyway...but if u did (ahem)...why not answer the emails instead of writin it in the forums...hopin for mor more attention?? u got it..well done...now drop it :)

i see everyone ran out of toilet paper and as usual is using their computer screens

i wonder if bela gets the goodies in Anne's vid

do i sence a hint of jealousy from "beauty"???

lame HA

And my best wishes to you Anne.

n/a

so was this man, someone on the site, or was someone, that u shared life with in real...dates, kissing, such as that?

n/a

n/a

and soes the world sit idley by agian?
or will we put ''sanctions'' on him that noone will honor?
or will the usa step in and start a fight there also?
uselss questions, no need responses:p

Dunno, how much oil does Uzbekistan produce? :D

they produce some hot girls

still the oil?
girls? well i think the girls need thier freedom CC could always use more hosts:D

Still the oil? Hell ya, still the oil!
For what other reason would the U.S. go to war, if not to secure a strategic foothold in place where America's life blood can be kept a-flowing? To stop humanitarian disaster? To spread liberty? Oh, it is to laugh. Ha ha. Ho ho. :D
Did you hear about the new sanctions against North Korea, by the way? Yeah, American companies can't send luxury goods their way no more. No new Escalade for little Kim - What the hell is he going to put his spinners on now? Poor little guy. :'(

hmmm--couldnt see

n/a

n/a

Privacy thing Kaz, wouldnt want my neighbours clicking in having a free browse & seeing me in some of the stuff im in (or not as case may be)LOL... members fine! but guests ? eek IL make an effort this week 2 talk 2 guests, il give u some feedback next week, so far ive found it time consuming & boring, and i am a firm believer that that anything worthwhile in this world costs. Im not really in2 talking people in2 becoming members, if they cant see the obvious advantages 4 themsleves they arent the type of viewer I like 2 attract x But il let u know how i get on x Maybe Il convert that big spender.

n/a

Yeah u know Ive had a think about this, and decided 2 open 1 picture from each of my sets 2 guests, without face shots, Il let you know my results x

cool paco---not so loud, everyone will hear you,, by the way, have a round on me

I'm ok. Not sure if I'm the Bill you are looking for though.

maria,, here is bill above, he not lost-cool

I have an electric, phone, water and cable TV bill. Any of those the one you want?

hahahhahahahaha guys, thank you !!!!

n/a

cool--i understand that,,, why does host ask members if have a gf or wife--by the way deep feelings you have a bf or husband--cool

n/a

i think she has bf or is engaged, look at her profilepics,she is wearing engagementring

n/a

its just my opinion ;but its better to know if host has bf or is married so member dont fall in love because he thinks she is single. i know most members come here for seeing nude or to get some hot action.but for members who are looking for a relation its better if host tell that they have bf or are married instead of breaking hearts or making people jealous

Just about everytime I have visited a host, they asked me first if I had a significant other. Until they ask me if i have a gf, the thought of asking them whether or not they had a bf had never even crossed my mind. Here is a typical scenario:
Host: Are you married?
Me: Nope, I'm single
Host: Do you have a gf?
Me: No, I am S-I-N-G-L-E!!
Host: Why no gf?
Me: Fuck if I know. How about you? Do you have a bf?
Host: Why you ask?
Me: Well, uhh, you just asked me, so why not?
And that is usually the only reason I ask if they have a bf. If they hadn't asked me about a gf first, then I really coudn't give a shit.

sounds typical first 3 mins of a session, except u forgot, to asy
Host: age
me:43
Host:where u from
....lol

Yeah, haha, I left that part out in order to keep it a little short. And another thing. Even if I know the host's bf is there hiding, that makes it even more fun, knowing he is fidgeting uncomfortably at the sight of his gf salavitating as she marvels at the sight of my huge beautiful schlong.

n/a

n/a

What's the difference between a guy from US and A and a guy from UK? Besides geographical location lmao

n/a

And where do you think I'm from?

n/a

Ohhh I really hope she goes to jail. The nasty bitch.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

cool--american choppers--what about bike week

Mythbusters is a great show!

Another show that I used to love was Junkyard Wars. Too bad it's no longer around, nor can you get it on DVD. :(

n/a