General Forum
A quick snapshot of US hosts.
There was some mention of US hosts on a previous thread, so I just did a search by country @ 5pm EDT and found 15 on line. Of that total, 5 were gay guys, 1 boy/girl couple, 1 tranny and the rest were dominas in Dungeon or Fetish. There were none in the Girl categories.
But that's just fine for me, I prefer he very sexy girls from Russia and eastern Europe.
But that's just fine for me, I prefer he very sexy girls from Russia and eastern Europe.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
the us girls are usually higher priced. And some "usa" girls are really in Europe! Look at the time on their profiles and also the electical outlets sometimes visible behind them in the wall
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
not sure about this ip address as a locator as lilstar lists USA as country of origin and she'sRussian. There is another I cannot recall did the same listing USA but when she returned to Russia changed over.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Yeah, plus supply and demand, there are so few of you girls, vs say Russian where there's like 130 or more at any given time. Good English..with of course, no translator, is certainly a big plus as well.
On other side of coin though, Romanian girls ...at least that I've encountered, speak great english. Last couple of sessions were with them in fact.
Anyway, take care.
On other side of coin though, Romanian girls ...at least that I've encountered, speak great english. Last couple of sessions were with them in fact.
Anyway, take care.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Yeah, some of you russian girls do fine with english...I wish in many cases, that translators were not needed, but that's not everybody, and just the way it is.
It's true too, that many europeans speak several languages, while most of us usa people have a hard enough time just with english :)
Actually, I have several friends who speak multiple languages, but that's not common.
As far as what you see in your room though at times...all I know, is that sometimes in my case I hit a wrong key, because I'm trying to hurry and it's ..um...dark :) lol.
Anyway, I think you guys are great, and much respect.
Take care.
It's true too, that many europeans speak several languages, while most of us usa people have a hard enough time just with english :)
Actually, I have several friends who speak multiple languages, but that's not common.
As far as what you see in your room though at times...all I know, is that sometimes in my case I hit a wrong key, because I'm trying to hurry and it's ..um...dark :) lol.
Anyway, I think you guys are great, and much respect.
Take care.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
I'm not Russian :)
There are mistakes that cannot be blamed on the "it's dark" :P like the huge difference between "your" and "you're", "they're" and "their"...and so on, and so forth.
There are typos, clearly, but there are also real mistakes. I am not going to poke fun at anyone, I was just pointing that we're not far inferior to the English native speakers. That's all :)
You take care too, you sound like a nice guy :)
There are mistakes that cannot be blamed on the "it's dark" :P like the huge difference between "your" and "you're", "they're" and "their"...and so on, and so forth.
There are typos, clearly, but there are also real mistakes. I am not going to poke fun at anyone, I was just pointing that we're not far inferior to the English native speakers. That's all :)
You take care too, you sound like a nice guy :)
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Yes I have to admit that I do sometimes make the your and you're mistake. I think it's because I pronounce them the same (and I'm to lazy to concentrate). The one that always jumps out at me is using loose for lose. Again probably because I pronounce them differently.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
So you grade a member's English skills in your pvt. Would that be considered a fetish?
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Do you mean you criticize members' spelling and grammar while they are in your paid videochat? And if so, would these members be considered money slaves we read so much about in profiles and in this forum?
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Completely agree with Miss T :)
Seriously, she was polite, and not for a second did I see her as being cruel or attacking anybody.
Seriously, she was polite, and not for a second did I see her as being cruel or attacking anybody.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
I didn't assume anything. I only asked a question. Really I was just curious. I have some hosts I know tell me some real wild stories about some of the viewers they have had in pvt over the years. And I see you post all the time and you appear to be very well versed a handling your customers in your pvt. And if I don't ask, I'll never know the answer to any questions I may have.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
"But no, I do not make fun of the guys that I have in chat or in private"
Ok, I understand now. I have read profiles where certain hosts advertise for viewers that like to be made fun of in pvt. It's their thing I guess. And hosts that perform these kinds of shows are only doing what the customer requests. And it's only good business acumen to be diversified to appeal to a wide customer base. And I'm sure you would agree with that premise.
Ok, I understand now. I have read profiles where certain hosts advertise for viewers that like to be made fun of in pvt. It's their thing I guess. And hosts that perform these kinds of shows are only doing what the customer requests. And it's only good business acumen to be diversified to appeal to a wide customer base. And I'm sure you would agree with that premise.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
"And I'm not into "I would do anything for money either". Which would explain why I have time to spend here :)"
Well yes of course. I was only saying that any business tries their best to appeal to the widest segment of buyers of whatever it is they sell. I am well aware of the workings of hosts in the Glamour category. And I'm only being honest when I say, it's not for everyone. But to some, you are the perfect choice.
Well yes of course. I was only saying that any business tries their best to appeal to the widest segment of buyers of whatever it is they sell. I am well aware of the workings of hosts in the Glamour category. And I'm only being honest when I say, it's not for everyone. But to some, you are the perfect choice.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
When people confuse "to" and "too", that one really bothers me two.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Yeah, later It hit me...she didn't say Russian in there at all, I just assumed that. You can't edit afterwards either. I thought about quickly adding a correction reply, but it was 5am here , so I just fell asleep. :)
But chu know, now dat I be thinking mo straite, I don't c any indicatshun of problems with are enlish, so I shore ain't gonna do nuthin about it. :p
And yes, I do try to be nice, thanks. Wanna go out? Kidding...that be a whole nother topic right thar as I'm sure you know. he he. This messed up english thing can be kind of fun.
Have a good one, stay positive.
But chu know, now dat I be thinking mo straite, I don't c any indicatshun of problems with are enlish, so I shore ain't gonna do nuthin about it. :p
And yes, I do try to be nice, thanks. Wanna go out? Kidding...that be a whole nother topic right thar as I'm sure you know. he he. This messed up english thing can be kind of fun.
Have a good one, stay positive.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
I agree. I remember being in comm chat and a member was belittling a host for using incorrect English. I gave the definition of what she had said to show that she was, in fact, correct. Unfortunately she thought I was also joining in belittling her and gave me an angry response :P
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
You've seriously been attacked Just for your nationality? Wow, that is Way beyond dumb...that's archaic and pathetic. Sorry about that.
Wasn't me, of course, but it sure goes to show how many real backwards thinking idiots are out there.
Later.
Wasn't me, of course, but it sure goes to show how many real backwards thinking idiots are out there.
Later.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Agreed, though on flip side of the coin, having been on this site for several years, I have run across many, many european hosts clearly using translators, which definitely detracts from the show.
It's also true that most europeans speak multiple languages, while many americans struggle with just their own. Further evidence of our education system in decline. It's just a simple, unfortunate fact.
As far as poor english when visiting your rooms, in my case at least...as hot as some of you girls are, I have a hard time just remembering my name, let alone typing coherent sentences. :)
Anyway, I both like and respect you guys very much. Take care.
It's also true that most europeans speak multiple languages, while many americans struggle with just their own. Further evidence of our education system in decline. It's just a simple, unfortunate fact.
As far as poor english when visiting your rooms, in my case at least...as hot as some of you girls are, I have a hard time just remembering my name, let alone typing coherent sentences. :)
Anyway, I both like and respect you guys very much. Take care.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
It is amazing the reasons one will invoke to see oneself worthier and superior to another. Ego at it’s best! Unfortunately, it is also an ego trap. It is living by comparison. From this perspective, there will always be that someone, seen by the ego, as a bit more superior, that will ultimately make one, feel inferior within its own superiority. We all have different talents :)
Just a thought...
:)
Just a thought...
:)
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
I choose not to engage in a confrontation with you along the lines of: “you said this”, I said that”. However, please do read your initial post, with a “fresh pair of eyes” and see what it implies.
:)
:)
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Another catfight, sweet! Hold that pose girls, gonna go get some popcorn. For goodness sakes just...kiss and makeup...or makeout...or something. Damn. It's getting hot in here.
Just kidding, having some fun :) Smile ladies....or I'll have to spank you.
Just kidding, having some fun :) Smile ladies....or I'll have to spank you.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
"I am in Fetish. I'm willing to do traditional shows if it's wanted, though my "normal" shows are suited for Glamour Girls, not Instant Action or the like."
A non nude host. Just as in Glamour, nudity is NOT required in Fetish.
A non nude host. Just as in Glamour, nudity is NOT required in Fetish.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
I just call them as I see them. What you do or don't do is your choice. I never said it was a flaw. But there are some of us more traditional pervs that enjoy seeing naked girls. I was only pointing out that he hosts in Fetish are not obligated to do a nude show, the same as it is for Glamour and little shy in softcore. That is a fact, not an opinion.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
So why badger the girl by pointing out the obvious; something she already knows.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
You're welcome. I never said it was a bad thing. Some things you think are obvious are not obvious to all who may read this forum. You stated very clearly your "show" when you said "But if you want an eloquently-speaking Mistress, then I'm your girl. Just because I'm not quite your "thing", that doesn't mean I'm any less popular with others. "
Some new viewers may think that Fetish, since it is in hardcore, that hosts are required to do nude show and they are not. They can if they choose just as the hosts in Glamour and little shy.
Some new viewers may think that Fetish, since it is in hardcore, that hosts are required to do nude show and they are not. They can if they choose just as the hosts in Glamour and little shy.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
Yeah...was wondering if you were going to see and / or respond to that.
I almost did earlier. Would've been basically this:
Another Member
" Just looks at American Girl, smiles, laughs, and sadly shakes his head"
Meaning of course, some people just don't get it do they? :) Even though I thought you were very clear from word one. And certainly in the last one...very well stated.
Take care, AG.
I almost did earlier. Would've been basically this:
Another Member
" Just looks at American Girl, smiles, laughs, and sadly shakes his head"
Meaning of course, some people just don't get it do they? :) Even though I thought you were very clear from word one. And certainly in the last one...very well stated.
Take care, AG.
RE: A quick snapshot of US hosts.
"If all they care about is nudity, then they should even be in our category."
I think you meant to say not be in our category and I agree. I have seen postings over time where viewers complained of a host not getting naked in Fetish or requiring he take them to 121 for a nude show. And the hosts in Fetish as in softcore are NOT obligated to ever do a nude show. As you mentioned the slaves and their dominas, there are also hosts that do nail shows and many other non nude shows. Yes hosts can do the hardest hardcore show on earth if they choose, but are under no obligation to do so.
I think you meant to say not be in our category and I agree. I have seen postings over time where viewers complained of a host not getting naked in Fetish or requiring he take them to 121 for a nude show. And the hosts in Fetish as in softcore are NOT obligated to ever do a nude show. As you mentioned the slaves and their dominas, there are also hosts that do nail shows and many other non nude shows. Yes hosts can do the hardest hardcore show on earth if they choose, but are under no obligation to do so.
A response to A response to the Angry thread
Why can't we keep our responses in the thread to which we are responding instead of responding to a new response in a non-responsive new responding thread.
Respond.
Respond.
A response to the Angry thread
How you or anyone else spends his money is a matter for you to decide. There is no doubt there are a great many hosts in every category, including IA that would be happy to sit and simply chat in pvt with a member. But if hosts get member chatters in their rooms on a regular basis, they tend to start thinking all or at least most members only want to talk in pvt. If I were a host, I'd do the same thing as having long talks in pvt mean much more money in their bi weekly check. So chatters do drive the price up and performance down site wide in my opinion.
I know that is not the intention of chatters, they are only trying to do their thing with no malice towards others. But you do have that supply and demand element present. And again , in my opinion, I think that infuriates some of the members looking for the naked girls cc advertises off site.
But like it or not, it appears to me that CC's formula has worked very well for the site and the core hosts that have been on site for some period of time. So if it ain't broke, don't fix it. And viewers who like to see naked girls, get your Google on, there is no shortage of those sites on the net.
I know that is not the intention of chatters, they are only trying to do their thing with no malice towards others. But you do have that supply and demand element present. And again , in my opinion, I think that infuriates some of the members looking for the naked girls cc advertises off site.
But like it or not, it appears to me that CC's formula has worked very well for the site and the core hosts that have been on site for some period of time. So if it ain't broke, don't fix it. And viewers who like to see naked girls, get your Google on, there is no shortage of those sites on the net.
RE: A response to the responder
I love the way, in your scheme of things, hosts seem to have no minds of their own and are but merely respondents to stimuli -- "But if hosts get member chatters in their rooms on a regular basis, they tend to start thinking all or at least most members only want to talk in pvt."
"If I were a host, I'd do the same thing as having long talks in pvt mean much more money in their bi weekly check." -- But you aren't a host, and even if you were and this is how you would respond, how can you say other hosts would as well? Are you not an individual? Are they not individuals?
"So chatters do drive the price up and performance down site wide in my opinion." -- And can you show us the statistical evidence of this? Or is this just your own opinion?
"But like it or not, it appears to me that CC's formula has worked very well for the site . . . So if it ain't broke, don't fix it." -- I wasn't criticizing CC or suggesting CC change anything. My beef is with a certain member (or members) who insist on labeling us who like mostly to chat as "slaves/sissy boys."
"And viewers who like to see naked girls, get your Google on, there is no shortage of those sites on the net." That is true, but I fail to comprehend the need for this statement. There is enough here for everyone, so why send them anywhere else?
RE: A response to the responder
No I never said hosts have no mind of their own. They do indeed and for the most part are good business women. If a host in IA only talks with a viewer, if that is what he wants, she is only doing what her paying customer wants. I have seen first hand viewers simply taking with hosts in IA. The hosts are just trying to meet the market and satisfy the needs of their paying customers. There is no rule on cc that prohibits viewers and hosts simply just talking in pvt even in IA.
RE: A response to the responder
My beef is with a certain member (or members) who insist on labeling us who like mostly to chat as "slaves/sissy boys."
Hmm....ImUrMrNiceGuy, I have not seen this. Since you obviously have no problem showing context from previous posts, please show evidence of this. Any evidence. Apparently you ran across this several times, so it should not be a problem. I am merely a skeptic at this point, not saying anything against you...or anyone else. So please show evidence would be very much appreciated.
Hmm....ImUrMrNiceGuy, I have not seen this. Since you obviously have no problem showing context from previous posts, please show evidence of this. Any evidence. Apparently you ran across this several times, so it should not be a problem. I am merely a skeptic at this point, not saying anything against you...or anyone else. So please show evidence would be very much appreciated.
RE: A response to the responder
You Go girl! Yes, god forbid someone post not perfectly in place; happens all the time :)
RE: A response to the responder
I'm not "Uhh" but I hope you know that my criticism earlier was not addressing your use of the terms "slave and sissyboy." This is not what I was objecting to. The context in which you use the terms is appropriate.
RE: A response to the Angry thread
I think that sissyboy slave should lose his money however he likes.
Who are we to judge the poor fool?
Who are we to judge the poor fool?
Dancing
Do hosts really love to dance for the people who join there chat rooms? Maybe dancing naked is something others have done. For me, I have already dance my naked butt on cam.
We all should have fun and dance the nites away!!!!!!!!!!!!
We all should have fun and dance the nites away!!!!!!!!!!!!
Any other sissies out there?
I am such a sissy, I really love it when a woman takes control of me and uses me for either her amusement or financial gain. does anyone here agree with me that women should rule the world and men should all be little slave bitch boys?
RE: Any other sissies out there?
I love finding women like you, who are usually Dom, and turning them into little slave girls for me pleasure! It is much more fun than start with a sub girl, no challenge there.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
"p.s. not all dominas hang out in dungeon (hint, hint) :P"
You got that right. They are in every category. CC has become Domina Central.
You got that right. They are in every category. CC has become Domina Central.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Thing is I can't find no 'elle' in Glamour. So if you want to let me be the man showing you some tricks, little one then you should either hint hint more or CCMail me!
Maybe you have a slight chance that I will be generous enough to visit your little room, missy.
Apology accepted for your missdemeanor, but I will still have to punish you for that. And you will like it. I know that. All do.
Maybe you have a slight chance that I will be generous enough to visit your little room, missy.
Apology accepted for your missdemeanor, but I will still have to punish you for that. And you will like it. I know that. All do.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Ok well done. You have my attention.
I don't understand this marketing trick getting us interested but not telling us your name. This doesn't work that way. You have a good idea but the execution is a little fucked up.
I am not jumping in and out Glamour profiles to get me blocked and voted 1min guy of the year or 'public enemy no1'. Remember that you were complaining about that!
And I cannot find any hints in your other posts. If there is even just only one 'elle'. So either write it in your profile or give us a hint here 'elle'.
Or does any of the viewers know more and care enough to give me a hint? CCMail appreciated. Maybe we work together on this?
I don't understand this marketing trick getting us interested but not telling us your name. This doesn't work that way. You have a good idea but the execution is a little fucked up.
I am not jumping in and out Glamour profiles to get me blocked and voted 1min guy of the year or 'public enemy no1'. Remember that you were complaining about that!
And I cannot find any hints in your other posts. If there is even just only one 'elle'. So either write it in your profile or give us a hint here 'elle'.
Or does any of the viewers know more and care enough to give me a hint? CCMail appreciated. Maybe we work together on this?
RE: Any other sissies out there?
You'd better be careful. If you don't tell these guys who you are they just might tell you to go to elle :P
RE: Any other sissies out there?
you just need a strong, slow hand. Elle, I bet when you do fing that man both of you will be cats in heat.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
so Elle, and more hints? category? country? The car you drive?
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Hell yeah! I'm there :) You guys are great, wish I did know who you are, would love to visit your rooms someday, but I think you are indeed wise to keep id's secret. Maybe someday cc will allow you to mail us directly again without visiting you first.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Ok. I take that challenge.
Your spelling of of wannabies brought me to the band ELLEgarden. So the hint is hidden in those lyrics?
SSGB the G was a joke? Or do you know each other?
So the other question remains. You have dark long straight hair?
So give us at least a chance to visit you and reward you for your little game!
Your spelling of of wannabies brought me to the band ELLEgarden. So the hint is hidden in those lyrics?
SSGB the G was a joke? Or do you know each other?
So the other question remains. You have dark long straight hair?
So give us at least a chance to visit you and reward you for your little game!
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Actually I dont play the game, as i didnt get any your hints. lol But I often see one host online, with elle in her nick, so i thought that's maybe you.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
... yet you call yourself a "girl". that's not very, uhm, female supremacist of you. hahaha
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Come on, Monika, you can do better than that. Get off that cute little butt of yours and say something controversial. Stir things up a little, please. These forum posts of late are putting me to sleep.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
at least was smart enough to use his real screen name ...imagine the emails
RE: Any other sissies out there?
well no, not ALL men. every strong, powerful woman's hidden desire, is to find her male counterpart. unless she's a lesbian. or has other issues.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
"or has other issues"
Yeah like Andrea Dworken, Margaret Sanger, Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg et al.
Yeah like Andrea Dworken, Margaret Sanger, Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg et al.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Dworkin was an extreme feminist, which makes sense given the abuse she's experienced from men. add her time as a prostitute to that, etc. of course she had issues.
anyway, why would you enumerate the names of FEMINISTS you happened to stumble across, when the discussion was about female superiority/female supremacy, which has nothing to do with feminism.
anyway, why would you enumerate the names of FEMINISTS you happened to stumble across, when the discussion was about female superiority/female supremacy, which has nothing to do with feminism.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
"why would you enumerate the names of FEMINISTS you happened to stumble across, when the discussion was about female superiority/female supremacy, which has nothing to do with feminism."
I didn't stumble across those names, they are very well known. And feminism is about female supremacy. Only a mangina or sissy boy would argue it is anything else.
I didn't stumble across those names, they are very well known. And feminism is about female supremacy. Only a mangina or sissy boy would argue it is anything else.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Anyone can post on Wikipedia. And that stated objective of any movement is not always what it really wants to do. There are comparisons between feminism and Marxism. Do some more reading.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
I may not always agree with every single word Adayla says, but she is clearly very sharp, and she is always polite as well. I always look forward to seeing what she has to say.
Adayla
Yes. Sharp and a nice. Adayla is always smiling and enjoying herself. Makes you lose track of time if you explore all her different sides. Also the not so polite one. She is everybody darling just at the surface. A minx if you get to know her better and make her feel comfortable. Then you might wake her hidden dark kinky side! Especially if she switches her Adayla profile to Glamour for a private like last night.
And then you get all what you ever dreamed of and more for a grande finale.
Too sad that her exclusive profile is not so exclusive anymore. Always felt special and honored cumming to the regular bonus treatment.
And then you get all what you ever dreamed of and more for a grande finale.
Too sad that her exclusive profile is not so exclusive anymore. Always felt special and honored cumming to the regular bonus treatment.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
I think she was being sarcastic referring to wikipedia. It appears he is only spouting biases, rather than bothering to state facts regarding feminism. While some feminists may in fact see themselves as being superior, the primary thrust of feminism is about equality of opportunity and respect. (Can I use the word "thrust" in a conversation about feminism?)
RE: Any other sissies out there?
"I think she was being sarcastic referring to wikipedia."
And you know what she is thinking, how?
And you know what she is thinking, how?
RE: Any other sissies out there?
Okay, smart alec. READ MY LIPS: I said, "I THINK she was being sarcastic" Nothing about knowing what was in her mind.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
"Amen my brother!"
And how do you know "critical person" is your brother?
Or do you have the ability to see who is actually posting, how?
See, I can be just as smart alecky as you :D
And how do you know "critical person" is your brother?
Or do you have the ability to see who is actually posting, how?
See, I can be just as smart alecky as you :D
RE: Any other sissies out there?
WOW, Feminism is about Female Supremacy...
No, buddy, that would be FemiNAZIsm. OK? Bad troll is bad.
No, buddy, that would be FemiNAZIsm. OK? Bad troll is bad.
RE: Any other sissies out there?
He he, you bet it is, missy!
And you wanna know what else I find particularly interesting?
The way genuinely intelligent, educated hosts, bring out the inferiority complex in some people. Just one extra reason to enjoy being here=))
And you wanna know what else I find particularly interesting?
The way genuinely intelligent, educated hosts, bring out the inferiority complex in some people. Just one extra reason to enjoy being here=))
Angry
I'm a guy who likes to chat. I don't mind paying to do so, if I can enjoy the online company of a nice, attractive woman. I don't need to see her nude, I don't need to flog my log. My sexual desires are met in more wholesome ways than whacking off in a videochat session.
And I am sick and tired of coming to these forums and seeing guys like me referred to as "slaves" and "sissy boys" by narrow-minded, pig-headed jerks who probably couldn't get a date with a real girl if their life depended on it!
And I am sick and tired of coming to these forums and seeing guys like me referred to as "slaves" and "sissy boys" by narrow-minded, pig-headed jerks who probably couldn't get a date with a real girl if their life depended on it!
RE: Angry
Slaves: this is a refrence to members who enjoy being with Dominatrixes. Sissy-boys refers to members who enjoy humiliation. Doms will even use the term Slave in their teaser heading and in their profile. I have never seen either term in refrence to members who just enjoy chatting.
Members who enjoy sexual sessions with hosts...never having been on a date, kissed a girl, etc. To be fair, there are many, many people who would say it is beyond pathetic to actually pay money merely to talk to a girl.
Personally, I say there is nothing wrong with Either one :) To each their own. Just trying to show both sides. If you're not hurting anyone, do what you will is what I say.
Nobody likes to be attacked...but in this case, there dosen't seem to be one. I at least have never seen those terms used in a negative manner to describe members who enjoy chatting. Take care.
Members who enjoy sexual sessions with hosts...never having been on a date, kissed a girl, etc. To be fair, there are many, many people who would say it is beyond pathetic to actually pay money merely to talk to a girl.
Personally, I say there is nothing wrong with Either one :) To each their own. Just trying to show both sides. If you're not hurting anyone, do what you will is what I say.
Nobody likes to be attacked...but in this case, there dosen't seem to be one. I at least have never seen those terms used in a negative manner to describe members who enjoy chatting. Take care.
RE: Angry
I disagree, and in fact think you are being disingenuous. The terms may have a precise definition, but they are used repeatedly in the forums in a more generic sense as a term of criticism rather than identification. The OP is bang on the money. Btw, why do so many people feel it necessary to draw attention to the length of their membership, as if that somehow bestows credibility on their postings!
RE: Angry
Thank you, Plantagenet. You have hit the nail right on the head. Whether or not Member-long time was being disingenuous, or just plain naive, or even hasn't seen all the critical, name-calling posts in which members such as myself are blasted as "slaves" and "sissy-boys", he clearly missed the mark in his comments.
Member-long time, I clearly know the definitions which you have given. I wasn't born yesterday. In fact the thread a little ways below this one uses those terms as they are intended. I was not referring to her thread, but the ongoing barrage by a certain member (or members) which has filled these forums for quite some time now. Re-reading through the forums today, it just p-o'd me to no end, and so I spoke out.
Member-long time, I clearly know the definitions which you have given. I wasn't born yesterday. In fact the thread a little ways below this one uses those terms as they are intended. I was not referring to her thread, but the ongoing barrage by a certain member (or members) which has filled these forums for quite some time now. Re-reading through the forums today, it just p-o'd me to no end, and so I spoke out.
RE: Angry
Long time member, etc...generic, simple, and accurate. Credibility...who cares. A member is a member, all views are valid.
As stated previously...if those statements are out there...directed at members who merely chat..I haven't seen them. Dosent mean they are not there, just that I haven't seen them. I Have however seen Doms refering to their own Slaves in a negative way...ie "who cares what my slaves think"...but that's all but expected...just continuing to play the game. Harmless.
Ironically, what clearly Was negative, was the OP slam against goodness knows how many members...couldn't get a date if their life depended on it.
Oh well. No worries for me, I do fine in real life, and certainly have fun here as well...I guess I just know too many attorneys...enjoy arguing more than I should :)
As stated previously...if those statements are out there...directed at members who merely chat..I haven't seen them. Dosent mean they are not there, just that I haven't seen them. I Have however seen Doms refering to their own Slaves in a negative way...ie "who cares what my slaves think"...but that's all but expected...just continuing to play the game. Harmless.
Ironically, what clearly Was negative, was the OP slam against goodness knows how many members...couldn't get a date if their life depended on it.
Oh well. No worries for me, I do fine in real life, and certainly have fun here as well...I guess I just know too many attorneys...enjoy arguing more than I should :)
RE: Angry
Accusations have definitely been made by implication. There were threads a while back complaining about members who did not request adult hosts to strrip so that when the posters jumped into the video session they did not already find the host naked.
RE: Angry
Hmm, since there are only about 10 USA hosts on at a time, after a comment like that, I think I'll just avoid all of them.
RE: Angry
Nope never.
However, I wondered about why guys would do that...figured they just came real quick...then I had 4 different hosts in a row that practically put me to sleep, a couple that didn't look at all like their pictures...and what reminded me of this, a couple with instantly bad attitudes...so for those who complain about 1min men, such as yourself, perhaps look in the mirror...a little bit of self reflection might be in order.
What prompted my reprimanding response in the first place...while initially you were at least admiralbly attempting to defend someone, you then went on to say..."I think those guys are probably bitter and jealous that they don't have the money to do any more than visit a host at a low price who barely speaks English, quickly stroke their cock, cum, then get out of there."
Sounds...just possibly...derogatory towards...god forbid...members who come to a sex site to enjoy sex...possibly don't have have much money...by all means, let's put people down for that...and now just for good measure, lets belittle your fellow hosts, because some of them may not speak perfect english.
So in order to avoid a negative experience, it seemed wise to just avoid an individual who could be so easily negative in the first place...and worse, do it so easily that they were not even aware of it.
However, I wondered about why guys would do that...figured they just came real quick...then I had 4 different hosts in a row that practically put me to sleep, a couple that didn't look at all like their pictures...and what reminded me of this, a couple with instantly bad attitudes...so for those who complain about 1min men, such as yourself, perhaps look in the mirror...a little bit of self reflection might be in order.
What prompted my reprimanding response in the first place...while initially you were at least admiralbly attempting to defend someone, you then went on to say..."I think those guys are probably bitter and jealous that they don't have the money to do any more than visit a host at a low price who barely speaks English, quickly stroke their cock, cum, then get out of there."
Sounds...just possibly...derogatory towards...god forbid...members who come to a sex site to enjoy sex...possibly don't have have much money...by all means, let's put people down for that...and now just for good measure, lets belittle your fellow hosts, because some of them may not speak perfect english.
So in order to avoid a negative experience, it seemed wise to just avoid an individual who could be so easily negative in the first place...and worse, do it so easily that they were not even aware of it.
RE: Angry
I come here to see naked girls but that certainly does not make me a minute man. Most of my videos are between 45 minutes and 2 hours.
My answer to your question "If you can afford chatting longer then why not do it?" is quite simply I can do that for free in the real world. What I can't get is those same sexy young girls to get naked for me.
Oh and most of the hosts have very good English skills.
My answer to your question "If you can afford chatting longer then why not do it?" is quite simply I can do that for free in the real world. What I can't get is those same sexy young girls to get naked for me.
Oh and most of the hosts have very good English skills.
RE: Angry
So, you did a web search for "nice conversation" and it directed you to this sex site?
RE: Angry
The part about the anger, I understood. It was the rest of it that seemed like you didn't really understand what I was saying. Anyway.... your point is taken :)
RE: Angry
"And I am sick and tired of coming to these forums and seeing guys like me referred to as "slaves" and "sissy boys" by narrow-minded, pig-headed jerks who probably couldn't get a date with a real girl if their life depended on it!"
Then stop coming to the forums!
Then stop coming to the forums!
RE: Angry
Excuse me? Is that your response to everyone who doesn't like something? Stop doing it? Stop coming to the forums? Did it ever occur to you that I may enjoy the forums in general, but this one particular aspect of it I despise?
RE: Angry
"Excuse me? Is that your response to everyone who doesn't like something?"
No, I was only saying it to you.
No, I was only saying it to you.
RE: Angry
Well my previous answer still stands. It's not the forum I dislike. It's what certain members have said. Why should I stop enjoying something I enjoy, just because of a few jerks? Rather speak my mind -- or is that not allowed?
RE: Angry
Ok I understand. You think only posts you approve of should be in this forum. At the top of this forum it does say FREE SPEECH. I may disagree with you and others but would never want to censor your right to free speech. But it seems you would like to censor me.
RE: Angry
Excuse me? I never once said anything about anyone not being able to post anything. I said it made me angry. Angry enough to post a reaction to it. You are most certainly entitled to say whatever crap you want to say, of course, but I am equally entitled to be pissed when it is directly (or indirectly) directed at me, and others who share my approach.
No one is calling for censorship here. You are putting words in my mouth that I never said, nor implied.
No, I do not want to censor you. However, I would like to punch you in the mouth! haha (just joking)
The sad thing is that you, like so many in our day, claim "freedom of speech" as the license to do or say what they want, without regard or respect for others. You want your "right" to say whatever you want, but don't give a crap about others' "rights" not to be abused or misrepresented.
But the truth is, there is no absolute freedom -- ever. There are always limitations. Even CC limits the "freedom of speech" they promote -- no SPAM, no posting in the wrong forum, and of course, as we all know, no anything they decide is not conducive to a good forum.
Obviously, from your comments, you are the "certain member" to whom my anger was directed. I suggest you might want to practice some self-limitation of your "right" to free speech.
No one is calling for censorship here. You are putting words in my mouth that I never said, nor implied.
No, I do not want to censor you. However, I would like to punch you in the mouth! haha (just joking)
The sad thing is that you, like so many in our day, claim "freedom of speech" as the license to do or say what they want, without regard or respect for others. You want your "right" to say whatever you want, but don't give a crap about others' "rights" not to be abused or misrepresented.
But the truth is, there is no absolute freedom -- ever. There are always limitations. Even CC limits the "freedom of speech" they promote -- no SPAM, no posting in the wrong forum, and of course, as we all know, no anything they decide is not conducive to a good forum.
Obviously, from your comments, you are the "certain member" to whom my anger was directed. I suggest you might want to practice some self-limitation of your "right" to free speech.
RE: Angry
So, is this the kind of scintillating conversation you pay for when you vid with hot chicks online?
RE: Angry
first of all, I don't chat with chicks. I chat with women.
second of all, what I chat about is none of your business.
third of all, why should you care?
second of all, what I chat about is none of your business.
third of all, why should you care?
RE: Angry
While it is completely up to you how you spend your money I have always wondered why someone whose "sexual desires are met in more wholesome ways than whacking off in a videochat session. " cannot also chat to the people who are fulfilling those desires.
As I said above, I can chat to young sexy women all day at work or on nights out, but I cannot get any of them to strip naked for me.
As I said above, I can chat to young sexy women all day at work or on nights out, but I cannot get any of them to strip naked for me.
RE: Angry
No disrespect to you, INYF, because I have always enjoyed your posts, but in this case you are mincing words.
I'm not restricting anybody from anything. Personally, I enjoy the chatting. If someone else wants to see gals naked and/or stroke in the process, that is their prerogative.
I'm not restricting anybody from anything. Personally, I enjoy the chatting. If someone else wants to see gals naked and/or stroke in the process, that is their prerogative.
Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
Just to be clear, in my post I never suggested we have free public video here. I got my idea for my post after being at another site that has free video and did see quite a few girls sitting alone in their rooms. I also said in my post, if I were a host, I would not want free public video. But also confessed that as a viewer I liked it.
In one of the replies someone mentioned viewers seeing a girl in free video on one site and then coming here for a pvt. Yes I've done that too My post is 100% honest and suggests no change for this site. I like this site and the hosts and my post was in no way a negative one. Again the idea came from what I saw on a site I had just left.
It seems any time any talk of options other sites have come up, many hosts talk about cc having the lowest prices and any extra viewer perks would increase the prices. Well I disagree. Adding full screen did not increase prices. Adding 2 way video and voice did not raise prices. Adding Comm Chat and CC Mail did not increase prices. You know in any business, you have improve your infrastructure to compete with other business in your field. It's all about the free market.
Ok I'm done. Sorry for the length of my post. Thanks again to all who replied below.
In one of the replies someone mentioned viewers seeing a girl in free video on one site and then coming here for a pvt. Yes I've done that too My post is 100% honest and suggests no change for this site. I like this site and the hosts and my post was in no way a negative one. Again the idea came from what I saw on a site I had just left.
It seems any time any talk of options other sites have come up, many hosts talk about cc having the lowest prices and any extra viewer perks would increase the prices. Well I disagree. Adding full screen did not increase prices. Adding 2 way video and voice did not raise prices. Adding Comm Chat and CC Mail did not increase prices. You know in any business, you have improve your infrastructure to compete with other business in your field. It's all about the free market.
Ok I'm done. Sorry for the length of my post. Thanks again to all who replied below.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
"All the new added features u enumerated dont take anything from a host"
I disagree. 2 way cam and voice added to what a host has to do. For some talking is harder than typing in a 2nd language and then they have to look at member cam and can not focus on what they do as much. But again, as I stated, I am not suggesting cc ad free video or anything else. CC can go back to its origins with no full screen, mail or c2c and I will not complain. I have never asked nor suggested they change anything back in 2000 and not doing so now.
I disagree. 2 way cam and voice added to what a host has to do. For some talking is harder than typing in a 2nd language and then they have to look at member cam and can not focus on what they do as much. But again, as I stated, I am not suggesting cc ad free video or anything else. CC can go back to its origins with no full screen, mail or c2c and I will not complain. I have never asked nor suggested they change anything back in 2000 and not doing so now.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
"and by the way, in my humble opinion, cam2cam only made communication/interaction easier :)"
Maybe for you and some other hosts, but I know hosts that have had issues with it. But again, I have never suggested any changes or upgrades. But all business has to modernize to keep up with it competitors. Back in the early 20th Century many businesses sold carriages for horses, but then we got the horseless carriages and we all know how that turned out.
Maybe for you and some other hosts, but I know hosts that have had issues with it. But again, I have never suggested any changes or upgrades. But all business has to modernize to keep up with it competitors. Back in the early 20th Century many businesses sold carriages for horses, but then we got the horseless carriages and we all know how that turned out.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
Good, interesting point. Would be kinda like you against the world, huh? Having been in a ton of rooms, it IS like that sometimes..host and a bunch of guys, several of which are beggars...must get sooo old. Don't know how many times I've seen something like: "show tits baby, and I take you private." Yeah right.
I just like to see the girl real quick, and if I like what I see, I always ask the same one or two questions: "...do you have sound, could you just say hello or something?" (having been lied to about this before) 2. "...so where you from?" (particularly if they Do have sound, I can now get an idea how good their english is). For me, that's it...if everything's good, then it's off to private :) Oh...if they're not showing their face, I'll ask to see that.
Anyway, I can certainly see getting nervous knowing, that all eyes are on you, and there are 20-25 of em. Heck, I've seen rooms, where there's 100-300 people watching the host. I've also been in rooms where it simply dosent say how many people are in the room at all, so you have no idea...only indication is by visible chat.
I think it all boils down to this: Most members..not all perhaps, but certainly most would like this feature, and conversely most hosts would not; so I doubt it will ever happen.
I just like to see the girl real quick, and if I like what I see, I always ask the same one or two questions: "...do you have sound, could you just say hello or something?" (having been lied to about this before) 2. "...so where you from?" (particularly if they Do have sound, I can now get an idea how good their english is). For me, that's it...if everything's good, then it's off to private :) Oh...if they're not showing their face, I'll ask to see that.
Anyway, I can certainly see getting nervous knowing, that all eyes are on you, and there are 20-25 of em. Heck, I've seen rooms, where there's 100-300 people watching the host. I've also been in rooms where it simply dosent say how many people are in the room at all, so you have no idea...only indication is by visible chat.
I think it all boils down to this: Most members..not all perhaps, but certainly most would like this feature, and conversely most hosts would not; so I doubt it will ever happen.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
That comparison is not valid.
The one's on those sites who don't see more money are the ones sitting on their ass doing nothing or have a bitchy attitude towards the viewers. There's usually only a handful of people in their room. There are few hosts from here who are in that category on those sites.
They aren't doing more work for less money; they're just making their worth.
The ones who put a little effort into it (ie, not acting like a statue, not ignoring the viewers, not acting like an entitled bitch) can easily draw people into paid privates and keep a flow of tips going to them in public, and actually make some money for their time.
They are also making their worth... for the most part. There are, of course, always exceptions.
The one's on those sites who don't see more money are the ones sitting on their ass doing nothing or have a bitchy attitude towards the viewers. There's usually only a handful of people in their room. There are few hosts from here who are in that category on those sites.
They aren't doing more work for less money; they're just making their worth.
The ones who put a little effort into it (ie, not acting like a statue, not ignoring the viewers, not acting like an entitled bitch) can easily draw people into paid privates and keep a flow of tips going to them in public, and actually make some money for their time.
They are also making their worth... for the most part. There are, of course, always exceptions.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
Plus, if those hosts sitting alone in their room would..or were able to...lower their price..they very likely would not be sitting there alone.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
$4 a minute , try $6 a minute for the free site.
RE: Thanks to hosts and members that replied to my post below.
Yes it is $6 for pvt but only $1 for Group show of 3 and I've countless free shows in public video and sometimes tipped and others times did not tip.
Do any of you forum posters post in other forums or blogs on other sites?
I'm talking social network sites such as Facebook, Twitter et al
RE: Do any of you forum posters post in other forums or blogs on other sites?
Almost never. Like maybe once or twice a year on some random site, because something caught my eye; otherwise no, not at all.
Never thought about it, but here's the reason: on this site I actually interact directly with people...obviously video chat sessions with hosts...and topics, and discussions in these forums, might ultimately affect the quality of those sessions. Though mostly not I guess, because god forbid we change Anything about cc :)
Never thought about it, but here's the reason: on this site I actually interact directly with people...obviously video chat sessions with hosts...and topics, and discussions in these forums, might ultimately affect the quality of those sessions. Though mostly not I guess, because god forbid we change Anything about cc :)
The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
Yes there are several reasons hosts do not want free public video. One reason is there is no reason to have it. But in my opinion, the biggest reason is that it would show how busy or how slow a host was. On one site I go to, you can enter some rooms and you are the only viewer. There aren't even guests is some rooms. If I were a host I wouldn't want free public video, but as a viewer, I love them.
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
There are various reasons why hosts do not want free publice video but I am sure the main one is that this would require them to be chatting and active as a host in front of cam the whole time. With the present system a host can do her personal stuff either on the computer or off it when there is no one in video as long as she is close enough to the computer to get to it within a couple of seconds of someone entering video.
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
I am a huge fan of public video...because as a viewer you get to see exactly what you'll be getting, and also get a very good idea of personality, and therefore performance quality.
Also, it is possible with some systems I've seen, for the host to take a break, and the screen says exactly that...words to the effect: "Taking a short break be right back."
Hosts don't like...probably even Hate dealing with all the beggars, and I don't blame them. That would get sooo old, in about 5 min let alone, for several hours. That's why you also need a good system for kicking, and banning...an easy way to take out the trash, so to speak.
Other systems I've seen have a nice option: It lets the host record a quick teaser at the start of her shift, which she can shift between that, and live view whenever she wants. You see whichever view the host has selected, live or teaser, just by puting your cursor over the hosts picture. When she goes in private, the teaser automatically goes on. Often the teaser will be what gets me in the room if done well.
So yeah, I'm all for it, big time. I'd say this site definitely has the best prices...it's the only one I'm aware of with both a forum and community chat. The one major element it's missing is public video..if it had that, it would be the best site Period in my opinion..but the lack of it, is definitely a strike against from a viewers perspective.
So cmon, cc update and be Number One. :)
Also, it is possible with some systems I've seen, for the host to take a break, and the screen says exactly that...words to the effect: "Taking a short break be right back."
Hosts don't like...probably even Hate dealing with all the beggars, and I don't blame them. That would get sooo old, in about 5 min let alone, for several hours. That's why you also need a good system for kicking, and banning...an easy way to take out the trash, so to speak.
Other systems I've seen have a nice option: It lets the host record a quick teaser at the start of her shift, which she can shift between that, and live view whenever she wants. You see whichever view the host has selected, live or teaser, just by puting your cursor over the hosts picture. When she goes in private, the teaser automatically goes on. Often the teaser will be what gets me in the room if done well.
So yeah, I'm all for it, big time. I'd say this site definitely has the best prices...it's the only one I'm aware of with both a forum and community chat. The one major element it's missing is public video..if it had that, it would be the best site Period in my opinion..but the lack of it, is definitely a strike against from a viewers perspective.
So cmon, cc update and be Number One. :)
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
Yesterday a host called Butterflly had open price $7 and 121 $11.98
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
So does that mean members come here looking for same show for less money?
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
IF....and if it Dosen't raise the price? If this feature was added, why go to any other site...this feature would put cc on a level playing field with the other sites...however, they would stand alone on the issue of price, having the lowest by far. It's therefore very likely, that cc would see quite the increase in memberships, and so have no reason to raise prices...especially since having the lowest prices around, is primarily what drew most members here in the first place.
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
Ahhh, I see, so let's be crystal clear...we're not saying cc would raise it's prices, but rather, that You would raise Your prices.
Well, fortunately not all hosts are you. I'm quite sure that given the change discussed, many hosts would leave their prices the same, and just enjoy the increase in clients.
Well, fortunately not all hosts are you. I'm quite sure that given the change discussed, many hosts would leave their prices the same, and just enjoy the increase in clients.
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
Just wondering; how do we know that single feature would have anything to do with raising the price? I mean, I'm not a software engineer, but would there be any cost to maintain a feature like that? Wouldn't all the cost be just in the development and implementation? Of a program which has already been developed? How expensive could it be? I've worked at plenty of places where the computer guys changed part of our programs...sometimes very significantly, and there wasn't any major expense, they just did it.
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
Why should CC change to be like the MANY other sites out there? The way it is works, if it aint broke don't fix it.
I see so many people complaining over the years, it makes me laugh, simple answer is this, if you are not happy with the way this site is, and as many have stated, they go to numerous other sites,why not just stay on the other sites?
I see so many people complaining over the years, it makes me laugh, simple answer is this, if you are not happy with the way this site is, and as many have stated, they go to numerous other sites,why not just stay on the other sites?
RE: The biggest reason hosts don't want free public video
So actually they are deathly afraid it will raise the price, and tire them out. :)
Below thread. Try MissColombia, Izabelle, Adayla and HotSvea!
For the thread on cumming below, my insider suggestions and favourites to try out.
Mamacita MissColombia has the divine body of a supermodel and makes you feel special and filled with pride when she takes you onto a special journey full of joy which will not disappoint you to play with you and her with her juicy sinful lips she serves your inner most desires.
The newest pics of passionate Iza are just breathtaking and she sends you directly to heaven with her sexy body and enjoys to hear and fulfill all your exciting fantasies letting you forget your daily routine and leaving you behind in joyful ecstasy.
If you are one of a lucky few exclusive lady Ada chooses to pick you to cum for a special session to walk with you on her dark side and cannot wait to receive your explosion into her inviting sucking tool which is the alpha and omega of dirty and intellectual tease.
Uroda Svea is desperate and hungry for you for relieving kinky fun and spoils you passionately and endlessly with whatever you might desire or dream of putting you to sleep with a relaxed smile.
All are skilled flirting company more than worth their price label. So to answer this thread below these three girls really like to watch and see you satisfied and liberate a big load for them. And I like the way these smart ladies receive it in their warm welcoming rooms.
So guys I wonder what are your favourite CamContact hosts and why? Anyone else had such nice moments and experiences with these great girls worth every dollar? How about We share some reviews and suggest? Positive and negative! And hosts what do you enjoy most and expect of your CamContact viewers? Maybe even reviews too!
Thank you Lorena, Izabelle, Adayla and HotSvea, thank you for the great times CamContacts, thank you for your input CCCommunity!
Mamacita MissColombia has the divine body of a supermodel and makes you feel special and filled with pride when she takes you onto a special journey full of joy which will not disappoint you to play with you and her with her juicy sinful lips she serves your inner most desires.
The newest pics of passionate Iza are just breathtaking and she sends you directly to heaven with her sexy body and enjoys to hear and fulfill all your exciting fantasies letting you forget your daily routine and leaving you behind in joyful ecstasy.
If you are one of a lucky few exclusive lady Ada chooses to pick you to cum for a special session to walk with you on her dark side and cannot wait to receive your explosion into her inviting sucking tool which is the alpha and omega of dirty and intellectual tease.
Uroda Svea is desperate and hungry for you for relieving kinky fun and spoils you passionately and endlessly with whatever you might desire or dream of putting you to sleep with a relaxed smile.
All are skilled flirting company more than worth their price label. So to answer this thread below these three girls really like to watch and see you satisfied and liberate a big load for them. And I like the way these smart ladies receive it in their warm welcoming rooms.
So guys I wonder what are your favourite CamContact hosts and why? Anyone else had such nice moments and experiences with these great girls worth every dollar? How about We share some reviews and suggest? Positive and negative! And hosts what do you enjoy most and expect of your CamContact viewers? Maybe even reviews too!
Thank you Lorena, Izabelle, Adayla and HotSvea, thank you for the great times CamContacts, thank you for your input CCCommunity!
RE: Below thread. Try MissColombia, Izabelle, Adayla and HotSvea!
why didn't you post it below, why start a new tread about it, we all get the picture whom your favorites are
RE: Below thread. Try MissColombia, Izabelle, Adayla and HotSvea!
Why isn't this in the Viewer Forum. Looks like advertising by hosts themselves or studio boss.
Adriana
to the best girl around have a great birthday this week...look after yourself and have fun
RE: How do you members feel about alternative hairstyles?
I personally prefer long hair. Been with and enjoyed plenty of sexy, cute, short haired girls though as well.
Not much for girls with buzz head, mohawk, etc though. However, hair is very important, but still just one part of the whole package..so even if I hate the hair, if the face is beautiful, and you have a hot bod, then I still might be interested. Odds are I won't visit that person though, because I can probably just find someone else who has all 3 of those things that fit my tastes.
Btw...I'm not one of the slaves...have no problems with bad ass girls though...but just don't find some of the extreme hairstyles sexually appealing...to me. Take care. :)
Not much for girls with buzz head, mohawk, etc though. However, hair is very important, but still just one part of the whole package..so even if I hate the hair, if the face is beautiful, and you have a hot bod, then I still might be interested. Odds are I won't visit that person though, because I can probably just find someone else who has all 3 of those things that fit my tastes.
Btw...I'm not one of the slaves...have no problems with bad ass girls though...but just don't find some of the extreme hairstyles sexually appealing...to me. Take care. :)
RE: How do you members feel about alternative hairstyles?
I like normal hair colors,and normal styles, not anything wild or outlandish
RE: How do you members feel about alternative hairstyles?
I am not a member, but given I've been trolling cam sites for a long time, I can say that as long as the hairstyle really suits you and your personality, nothing can go wrong, traffic-wise. I change hairstyles and colours quite often, too. I had the sort of dark base with red/purple highlights you are talking about, and most of My guys loved it, both regulars and new visitors.
RE: How do you members feel about alternative hairstyles?
Do members notice hair? I'm a bit bald on top of my head and show myself from mid forehead down. Ironically I've had a few people say nice hair only seeing the end of my locks lol and no one ever asked to see anything hair related.
RE: How do you members feel about alternative hairstyles?
half bald woman? it's happen to men often after 30, to women very seldom. by the way u can use wigs or lengthen hair in salon if u r a woman u should know it. ;)
RE: How do you members feel about alternative hairstyles?
I didn't think a domina worried about how she appeared to her slaves. She owns them. Why worry about hairstyles?. Why worry about anything?
Your favourite all time vid encounter
Do you remember your hottest encounter with a host (or hosts, with any special members?) in all the detail you like? What stands out and made it different and memorable? Or is it all nice but hazy now?
I had one host tell me about a guy she knew once who asked her to initiate his nephew on a session where she couldnt see him but he could see what she did - she was pretty sure he was playing two roles and he was really the nephew. Another host wrote to me of her fantasy in long message where she was looking after me i was hugely erect but i prevented her from touching except with her lips. Very hot these two girls - very dirty minds but not even the sexiest i ever met - that would be telling.
I had one host tell me about a guy she knew once who asked her to initiate his nephew on a session where she couldnt see him but he could see what she did - she was pretty sure he was playing two roles and he was really the nephew. Another host wrote to me of her fantasy in long message where she was looking after me i was hugely erect but i prevented her from touching except with her lips. Very hot these two girls - very dirty minds but not even the sexiest i ever met - that would be telling.
RE: Your favourite all time vid encounter
wow, you wont hear this often from a host.. unless they're trying to milk your wallet
RE: Your favourite all time vid encounter
This host at least has some nice memories she can share with us. Have you ever had a successful vid (unless youre into humiliation ofc) where the hist DIDNT like your nice age, your eyes, your witty sweet banter and your elegant way of getting around to the business of depriving her of her pants which are already wet from your delicious teasing
RE: Your favourite all time vid encounter
Great question, and this is sooo easy for me, and I think a good message to all hosts....
My all time favorite cam girl...By Far..Every session was Awesome...of course is long gone...and I won't give her name, even though it's all good..I very much respect privacy...sure she wouldn't mind, but anyway...
Was simple..Every time, she had a Very passionate performance..was just simple masturbation with her toy..but god did she get into it..she really, really enjoyed herself all the way through, and just exploded..it was amazing, and awesome. Now the thing is..currently..the last 4 host in a row I've had...nice girls, etc...but sorry to say, their "hot performances" were just dead, practically put me to sleep...no worries, I was nice to them, and maybe they just don't have ...passion...and no I haven't set my standards too high, based on this other girl..I mean, I practically wanted to ask these people if they were even alive...that would be cruel, so of course I didn't, obviously, but you get the point.
I'm not trying to be mean..I just want the point to be clear...so if you don't have that within you, so be it...but if you do..or even if you're a good actress...maybe this girl in the past was acting..I seriously doubt it..if so, she was a Great actress :) but even if she was acting, I could care less, because damn it was hot..far better than masturbating, yet at the same time showing zero excitement in your actions...appearing like you're wondering about when you can get your nails done again or whatever.
So just give me a hot, hot performance...which of course, most of you claim you will do...but if you really can do that, then any of you who does will be in my list of best all time sessions.
Btw, to be fair, and positive, not all have been horrible..just the last 4....but some have been pretty darn good..say 4 stars...so good job..still looking for that 5 star performance out there though. :) Take care all. Be nice to each other out there.
My all time favorite cam girl...By Far..Every session was Awesome...of course is long gone...and I won't give her name, even though it's all good..I very much respect privacy...sure she wouldn't mind, but anyway...
Was simple..Every time, she had a Very passionate performance..was just simple masturbation with her toy..but god did she get into it..she really, really enjoyed herself all the way through, and just exploded..it was amazing, and awesome. Now the thing is..currently..the last 4 host in a row I've had...nice girls, etc...but sorry to say, their "hot performances" were just dead, practically put me to sleep...no worries, I was nice to them, and maybe they just don't have ...passion...and no I haven't set my standards too high, based on this other girl..I mean, I practically wanted to ask these people if they were even alive...that would be cruel, so of course I didn't, obviously, but you get the point.
I'm not trying to be mean..I just want the point to be clear...so if you don't have that within you, so be it...but if you do..or even if you're a good actress...maybe this girl in the past was acting..I seriously doubt it..if so, she was a Great actress :) but even if she was acting, I could care less, because damn it was hot..far better than masturbating, yet at the same time showing zero excitement in your actions...appearing like you're wondering about when you can get your nails done again or whatever.
So just give me a hot, hot performance...which of course, most of you claim you will do...but if you really can do that, then any of you who does will be in my list of best all time sessions.
Btw, to be fair, and positive, not all have been horrible..just the last 4....but some have been pretty darn good..say 4 stars...so good job..still looking for that 5 star performance out there though. :) Take care all. Be nice to each other out there.
A bit of irony in non adult category
This is not a negative post about the non adult category, but it honest about the irony involved. We all, both hosts and members are verified adults. Yet we have a non adult category on an adult cam site. Yes other sites do as well, but it is still oxymoronic to have such a combination.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have a non nude category? I mean one where the girls are not allowed to do a nude show as they are in Glamour and Little Shy.
Just my 2 cents on the situation.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have a non nude category? I mean one where the girls are not allowed to do a nude show as they are in Glamour and Little Shy.
Just my 2 cents on the situation.
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
I'm always polite to you guys...sorry again for the creeps you have to deal with...but in answer to your question...plenty of hosts in those softcore categorys, indicate in their profiles that they will indeed strip and put on a show. Usually it's not stated that specifically...ie I will strip, and give you hot show...buy it's clear enough. So therefore guys will ask...including me....though evidently I'm a bit more polite...if you say no, then that's it. But that's why...because plenty of hosts in softcore hint that they will strip, etc...so if it's not crystal clear one way or another in the profile, the only way to find out is to ask.
Stay positive we appreciate you :)
Stay positive we appreciate you :)
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
She was talking about non-Adult not softcore. To answer the question - some members like the idea of tasting "forbidden fruit". Getting a non-adult girl to strip counts as this.
Also there are certainly non-adult hosts who are prepared to switch categories. Regular members notice these hosts in other categories from time time time. To me it is legitimate to ask a host if she is ever in other categories but there is no excuse for being rude or pushy about this.
Also there are certainly non-adult hosts who are prepared to switch categories. Regular members notice these hosts in other categories from time time time. To me it is legitimate to ask a host if she is ever in other categories but there is no excuse for being rude or pushy about this.
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
Whoops, my bad. I'm normally so perceptive :) Non adult. In any case, agree completely. Isn't there a saying..forbidden fruit is the sweetest? Certainly no harm in asking if host does other categories..but again, no is no.
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
Unfortunately neither I nor other members who are polite and can read category guidelines have no control over the morons who are morons and can't nor choose not to read category guidelines.
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
I think the saying is: Forbidden fruit dies a slow, simmering death, rotting alone on its diseased, stinking vine... something like that. I can't remember the exact phrasing.
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
My question is why waste your time as a member in non-adult, I say keep it instant action that's where the excitement and fun is. Thank you cc for a great site
RE: members who want nudity in non adult
My question is, why waste money to rub one off in IA, when there's free porn all over the internet? See, every member has a different view on what's fun and exciting.
RE: a question for slaves
I do not read the hosts forum but I have chatted with both dommes and subs and I think your analysi is completely wrong. There is a BDSM community and in general those that belong are genuinely supportive of each other. That does not mean that they do not argue or debate from time to time.
What annoys dommes is when hosts from other categories are suffering from low traffic and think they will try dungeon. ANd what makes them really angry is when those hosts assume that being a domme is "easy work" because all it involves is being mean to members. This shows a lack of respect which is the ultimate no-no. If someone has a genuine interest in BDSM and has the character to be successful most dommes are happy to talk about it.
The true dominas are also not worried that their slaves will rush off to another domina host. Slaves are among the most loyal of members.
What annoys dommes is when hosts from other categories are suffering from low traffic and think they will try dungeon. ANd what makes them really angry is when those hosts assume that being a domme is "easy work" because all it involves is being mean to members. This shows a lack of respect which is the ultimate no-no. If someone has a genuine interest in BDSM and has the character to be successful most dommes are happy to talk about it.
The true dominas are also not worried that their slaves will rush off to another domina host. Slaves are among the most loyal of members.
RE: a question for slaves
Only one response other than mine so far, too bad...though it was a good one. I'm not a Slave, but was looking forward to reading more, sounded interesting.
Here's a thought or question to hopefully keep the ball rolling:
Other side of coin...looking at both Dungeon and Fetish cat just to be thorough..I see a number of Doms but Very Few submissives...If I could find the right one of those for my tastes...looks, price, etc etc...and could catch at the righ time for both of us...I'd certainly try one of Those...sounds fun. :)
Anyway, hope you get more responses, take care.
Here's a thought or question to hopefully keep the ball rolling:
Other side of coin...looking at both Dungeon and Fetish cat just to be thorough..I see a number of Doms but Very Few submissives...If I could find the right one of those for my tastes...looks, price, etc etc...and could catch at the righ time for both of us...I'd certainly try one of Those...sounds fun. :)
Anyway, hope you get more responses, take care.
RE: a question for slaves
For me it is important that a dominatrix looks either amazing or different and certainly not average or plain. It's hard to explain as it's not classical beauty but a certain attractive but nasty look that i go for. Then of course she has to have a good inventive mind because she will do most of the talking and not simply barking arrogant orders. Profiles that are very sparse or mention only about money do not get me interested.
So it's looks, profile and price that get me into video and then the personality and skills that keep me there.
So it's looks, profile and price that get me into video and then the personality and skills that keep me there.
hijack body photos
Look at some photos, fantastic body mixed in with average body for same host...bait and switch? Seen it more than a few times here. Host using somebody else's body photo to promote themselves.
RE: hijack body photos
....... or photos cut and pasted from internet. I've even seen the same 'fake' photo on 2 different hosts profiles and they were not the same host using 2 names! hahaha.
RE: hijack body photos
So help us all out and not report them to CC so they can take care of it.
RE: hijack body photos
Looking at your photos, you are fine just as you are! And with reference to your fantasy/reality thread below, keep it real and be proud of your white skin and freckles :-)
RE: hijack body photos
Interesting I tried to post about hosts using photos that are not of themselves several years ago and cc admin would never post my comments. I tried many times.
I confronted some hosts and they admitted it, and told the site where they got the photos.
Be smart girls -0- don't use photos with tattoos when you don't have a tattoo!
I confronted some hosts and they admitted it, and told the site where they got the photos.
Be smart girls -0- don't use photos with tattoos when you don't have a tattoo!
RE: hijack body photos - report
Report all obvious fakes to CC Help.
The reason you may see different girls photos in archives might be because the names are owned by a studio and the manager didn't clean the archives when he hired a new girl.
The reason you may see different girls photos in archives might be because the names are owned by a studio and the manager didn't clean the archives when he hired a new girl.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
There is no "or"... it is definitely a way to suck a few more dollars out of a member lol. There are of course other ways. I think some of us do want to hear the "yes, I'll meet" and delude themselves that it's the real thing when all indications are to the contrary.
But sometimes both the host and the member are deluded, enough so that they do in fact meet, and sometimes they are so deluded the ending is a happy one.
But sometimes both the host and the member are deluded, enough so that they do in fact meet, and sometimes they are so deluded the ending is a happy one.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
Ironically you caught the irony but the sense escaped you
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
It was a sarcastic remark, sweety. Basically it's an attempt at humor, and to make one's point, by saying the opposite of what is believed or felt. Helps if you can hear the person, it's normally clearly evident in the voice as well. Take care :)
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
I didn't mean to make light of your question. For me, early on, if you were to say you were interested in meeting I couldn't take you seriously. There just wouldn't be enough to go on. I might just have fun with the notion, but I honestly wouldn't expect it.
If we both felt a connection (and it needn't be a "love" connection lol), then I could see it actually happening. And it would be a more complicated matter at that point, involving consideration for the other person.
I have a host friend who has been saying for a couple years we ought to meet. And it would be possible, logistically, but It's not going to happen. I don't think she is serious. It's fun to talk about though.
If we both felt a connection (and it needn't be a "love" connection lol), then I could see it actually happening. And it would be a more complicated matter at that point, involving consideration for the other person.
I have a host friend who has been saying for a couple years we ought to meet. And it would be possible, logistically, but It's not going to happen. I don't think she is serious. It's fun to talk about though.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
It depends. By revealing you are married or have a boyfriend you shatter the illusions of some. The same thing for refusing to meet in reality. The best thing to do is to simply state that you are not here for meetings or to discuss personal stuff. You'll lose some, but you probably don't need them anyway.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
Hey Lillie, interesting post.
For me, I'd say just be totally honest with me. Generally speaking...I'm not going to bring it up...so I'd just as soon the host not bring it up, unless they are totally sincere. If it is seriously discussed, it's...again generally speaking...usually...going to involve significant amount of money...flight, hotel room, etc So I'd just as soon not be deceived.
Another point totally apart from the money. I'm generally a bit skeptical, and not naive...so I'm probably not going to believe it at all..and if indeed I come to the conclusion that the host is just trying to play me, then it will negatively reflect on her in my mind...so hypothetically speaking, if I'm a regular of that person, and suddenly believe she's lying to me, trying to play me, then those regular visits will likely stop.
So bottom line hosts, just be honest with me. If you want return visits, just be nice, and give me a good show. :)
For me, I'd say just be totally honest with me. Generally speaking...I'm not going to bring it up...so I'd just as soon the host not bring it up, unless they are totally sincere. If it is seriously discussed, it's...again generally speaking...usually...going to involve significant amount of money...flight, hotel room, etc So I'd just as soon not be deceived.
Another point totally apart from the money. I'm generally a bit skeptical, and not naive...so I'm probably not going to believe it at all..and if indeed I come to the conclusion that the host is just trying to play me, then it will negatively reflect on her in my mind...so hypothetically speaking, if I'm a regular of that person, and suddenly believe she's lying to me, trying to play me, then those regular visits will likely stop.
So bottom line hosts, just be honest with me. If you want return visits, just be nice, and give me a good show. :)
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
I've had many hosts in the softcore categories play that in person meeting and talk about their friends who married members. Its only done to prolong the paid video and mislead members.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
..it's too bad it's come to this. Even if you don't ask for it, you get it. Even if you don't want it, you get it (sort of). I guess this isn't the place for honesty. And in the end it will just ruin the day for those few who are honest, as they won't be believed in any case.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
In the example you gave I definitely want to hear the truth. Although, to be honest, I never ask to meet a host as I look like Quasimodo's ugly brother and I am probably older than most host's dads.
But for most other things I want fantasy :D
But for most other things I want fantasy :D
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
I would think a member would prefer reality if the one they are with in reality is willing to fulfill their fantasies...
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
If we think of the sexiest times in our lives i expect all of them had in common a bit of a fantsasy element. I doubt if even men and women differ in this - though you might speculate otherwise.
It's quite common for a fantasy build-up to the physical bit to stick out (so to speak) and even a new encounter to be disappointing relative to the fantasy of anticipation.
Of course there's an old english (IRONIC) saying about sex - when it's good it s REALLY REALLY good and when it's bad it's still pretty good.
What i'm saying is - it wouldnt be surprising if your guests were just as keen on the fantasy as the enjoyment they get from your undoubtedly sexy physical charms and sure, that keeps them coming (!) back
It's quite common for a fantasy build-up to the physical bit to stick out (so to speak) and even a new encounter to be disappointing relative to the fantasy of anticipation.
Of course there's an old english (IRONIC) saying about sex - when it's good it s REALLY REALLY good and when it's bad it's still pretty good.
What i'm saying is - it wouldnt be surprising if your guests were just as keen on the fantasy as the enjoyment they get from your undoubtedly sexy physical charms and sure, that keeps them coming (!) back
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
the saying as i know it is......when its good its good, and when its bad its really really good
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
For some the talk is all fantasy. The bad part is when one or the other party thinks it's for real. Mind you, in the 12 years I've been a member I have known of a fairly substantial number of marriages that have come from meetings on CC and countless satisfying real-life friendships.
The rule CC has about not exchanging info is to guard against off-CC paid video or the possibility of a girl soliciting for prostitution here.
There are many "connections" made via adult chat sites that are about neither cheating CC nor making prostitution. Both sides should be smart and careful.
The rule CC has about not exchanging info is to guard against off-CC paid video or the possibility of a girl soliciting for prostitution here.
There are many "connections" made via adult chat sites that are about neither cheating CC nor making prostitution. Both sides should be smart and careful.
RE: Do members prefer fantasy over reality?
If this site isn't "reality" then why do all these charges keep showing up on my credit card?
RE: Viewers, how important are hosts' schedules?
Whenever possible and state a time in GMT that you are on most times. For example evenings most week days , mornings on weekends or whatever. I've also read profiles where the host suggests sending a CC Mail to arrange a meeting.
RE: Viewers, how important are hosts' schedules?
No I just log on and see if any of my favourites are online. If not i search for a new girl to add into my favourites.
RE: Viewers, how important are hosts' schedules?
If a member is really interested to know when his fav host is on, he/she can set an alert and then will get an e-mail from cc when that host comes on line. Simple.
RE: Viewers, how important are hosts' schedules?
Yeah, I don't pay attention at all to what is listed in schedule. For one, I'm gonna cut the host alot of slack when it comes to this...I'm sure, one of the positive features of being a host, is the freedom that comes with it..so if you don't stick to your schedule, I'm not going to blame you, and therefore not really pay attention to it.
Like the others said basically, I just look at my favorites, and pick one.
Like the others said basically, I just look at my favorites, and pick one.
RE: Viewers, how important are hosts' schedules?
when i am horny she needs to be there.
got it?
got it?
RE: Viewers, how important are hosts' schedules?
Some guys couldn't care less as long as one of his favorites is online. But it is a courtesy to those to whome you are indeed special to give them a fair idea when you are online.
Secret Service & Columbian Girls
OK, Columbian girls, you deserve a medal!! So hot you busted the Secret Service!! I bet next time they pay cash and say thx!!!
The lesson here is: If you play you musy PAY!
The lesson here is: If you play you musy PAY!
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
They can play and pay with their own money not the US taxpayers' money!
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
They have several functions, but best known for being the USA Presidential bodyguards.
The reason this story is so big over here...USA...The Secret Service is very much known for their integrity, their ethical behaviour, good character, etc. From what I remember and have heard, there has Never been an incident in their Enitre history where their character was questioned...until now...so it's a huge story over here.
Thanks for asking Russian Host, I respect that. Not everyone knows everything; plenty I don't know about Russia :) Take care.
The reason this story is so big over here...USA...The Secret Service is very much known for their integrity, their ethical behaviour, good character, etc. From what I remember and have heard, there has Never been an incident in their Enitre history where their character was questioned...until now...so it's a huge story over here.
Thanks for asking Russian Host, I respect that. Not everyone knows everything; plenty I don't know about Russia :) Take care.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
Known by whom for their integrity, their ethical behavior, and good character? Good God, you sound like a recruiter.
Government thugs abusing their positions of authority - wow, color me shocked.
Government thugs abusing their positions of authority - wow, color me shocked.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
Point is, specifically regarding Known incidents...just centering on character and ethics, not performance...there have been very few if any, made public at least til now. Which is not to say that they Are perfect, or that I think they are...but the General Public Perception of them til now....has indeed been pretty close to perfect, as this is a group with very few, if Any, widely Known character blemishes...til now.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
Yeah, he probably knew that :) was just making a joke I think. and KGB is..was.. more like CIA in any case. Which we definitely still have.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
Shhh...no one's supposed to know...it's a secret, the name was changed to protect the um innocent.. lol :) Yeah...certainly every world power is going to have some form of intelligence agency.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
No, USA.
Seldom that there are Russian members? Hmmm...not surprising I guess. It Seems to be...that while there are members from all over the world, of course...generally speaking, Most members...seem to be from USA. Don't know, of course, just an observation.
Seldom that there are Russian members? Hmmm...not surprising I guess. It Seems to be...that while there are members from all over the world, of course...generally speaking, Most members...seem to be from USA. Don't know, of course, just an observation.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
Not necessarily. Just that US members tend to state where they are from more often than others. And possibly also hang around more on the forums than many others.
RE: Secret Service & Columbian Girls
Nope... American KGB is CIA. Secret Service protects the president and has a few other duties like pursuing counterfeiters.
Andrew Luck
Andrew Luck told he’ll be the first pick in the NFL draft-hmmm, not sure if any Colts fans here or not-but all I got to say is the Colts are crazy releasing Peyton Manning and going to spend all that money on signing Luck- I would take my pick on (QB) Robert Griffin who can throw and run--but Good Luck Colts
RE: Andrew Luck
I would pick Trent Richardson, but I'm not a Colts fan, so I'm glad their passing him up, maybe the Browns will get him and I would agree if I was picking a quarterback I would take Griffin
RE: Andrew Luck
Andrew Luck is going to need some luck, will be throw onto the playing field the first year, look out
RE: Andrew Luck
What does Andrew Luck, the Colts and the NFL have to do with this site? We don't watch the NFL on this site. In fact this is largely a European site. The vast majority of hosts and members have no interest at all in what you just posted about.
RE: Andrew Luck
My guess is viewers are mostly usa, and hosts are mostly europe...but who knows. And good point. But on the other hand, its harmless.
RE: Andrew Luck
I am a Colt fan and a NFL fan and it's a open forum for any type of discussion just like posting your opinion here and if you didn't like reading it, why did you open it.
RE: RIP Dick Clark
Read the book about him a few years ago- a very wise man and really knew his music-yessa RIP Mr. American Bandstand
RE: RIP Dick Clark
Very sad news. He was very important for the american teenagers with his "American Bandstand"-show. And at New years eve..it was always his show I watched, when i was child.
RE: RIP Dick Clark
Topic moved to the American forum...oh wait, there isn't one. Oh wait, it's this one?
RE: RIP Dick Clark
Dude, celebrity deaths touch us all. Kindly show a little respect and shed a tear for that guy that so many of us felt like we personally knew even though we really didn't.
Thank you.
Thank you.
RE: RIP Dick Clark
"On New Years' Eve it was always his show I watched when I was a child"
LOL I watched Guy Lombardo and his Royal Canadians! Guess I'm a bit older than you ;)
LOL I watched Guy Lombardo and his Royal Canadians! Guess I'm a bit older than you ;)
RE: RIP Dick Clark
American Bandstand I use to watch when I was a teenager always love his show
For the guys: Bush or no bush?
What's best to look at? Pick a number:
(1) - Smooth like a little girl
...
(5) - Trimmed, enough to be visible, clean bikini line
...
(10) - Need a compass to find the clitoris
My personal preference would be 6 to 7. What say you?
(1) - Smooth like a little girl
...
(5) - Trimmed, enough to be visible, clean bikini line
...
(10) - Need a compass to find the clitoris
My personal preference would be 6 to 7. What say you?
RE: For the guys: Bush or no bush?
5 or so is good, Don't like ones who look like they have not even hit puberty yet.
RE: For the guys: Bush or no bush?
What's best to look at? Pick a number:
(1) - Smooth like a little girl: I look more like a little boy when i shave it all.
...
(5) - Trimmed, enough to be visible, clean bikini line: I wear a mankini
...
(10) - Need a compass to find the clitoris: my willy might be small but to call it a clitoris is out of order.
(1) - Smooth like a little girl: I look more like a little boy when i shave it all.
...
(5) - Trimmed, enough to be visible, clean bikini line: I wear a mankini
...
(10) - Need a compass to find the clitoris: my willy might be small but to call it a clitoris is out of order.
RE: For the guys: Bush or no bush?
i answered this before: Pussy is Pussy. Dont tell me you ever said no thanks babe when she took off her panties! Now a TS would be a surprise, but I can find my way in the dark hair or not, as long as there is a wet spot somewhere.
RE: For the guys: Bush or no bush?
1 for sure
it's not fair to compare to little girls. that makes it sound like something is wrong and skewes the responses.
it's not fair to compare to little girls. that makes it sound like something is wrong and skewes the responses.
For the girls: Bush or no bush?
How's your vaginal grooming? Pick a number:
(1) - Smooth like a little girl
...
(5) - Trimmed, enough to be visible, clean bikini line
...
(10) - Need a compass to find the clitoris
(1) - Smooth like a little girl
...
(5) - Trimmed, enough to be visible, clean bikini line
...
(10) - Need a compass to find the clitoris
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
really now...hair is just disgusting in that area,i can't stand it in men or women...so, clearly 1
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
to Glam host, If u dont like hair then why not u shave ur head and eyebrow too!
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
"in that area" was the part that would have saved you asking your question wild bill/
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
lol...i drafted a dozen responses to pick-up on the same thing, but decided none of them would be posted. Your low-key response shows admirable restraint!
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
the thing with the hair keeping the bacteria away from the vagina was 2000 years ago when hygene was poor,not now when we can change our panties,wash and use so many other methods to keep bacteria and other things from that spot...we've progressed,in case u did not hear about that...i didn't have a single problem with my vagina and i've begun shaving since puberty...if i kep myself clean and had no incidents down there in 10 years...it won't happen now...no point in growing a bush down there to keep enemies away...it will only kep me from getting laid...lol
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
Glam host, same thing with the hair keeping the bacteria away from the head!
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
hey glam, dont worry, you will get laid hair or no hair! I promise to lick you too!
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
Shaved girls have more problem with pussy. Ive made a medical study about it myself...
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
Ohhh, be nice, that was a bit harsh. Her post was honest and light hearted, she even said:
"lool this terrible!!of course every have own likes/dislikes"
Basically showing she knows there are two sides, and this is just her view.
No wonder more people don't post or reply when so often people are attacked for stating a simple opinion, often unjustifiably so.
No worries, but it would just be nice not to see such constant negativity in these forums. Take care both of you. On the othe hand, if you want to have a cat fight, can I watch :) Just kidding...sort of.
"lool this terrible!!of course every have own likes/dislikes"
Basically showing she knows there are two sides, and this is just her view.
No wonder more people don't post or reply when so often people are attacked for stating a simple opinion, often unjustifiably so.
No worries, but it would just be nice not to see such constant negativity in these forums. Take care both of you. On the othe hand, if you want to have a cat fight, can I watch :) Just kidding...sort of.
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
The way she said things made me not want to even finish reading her post. A person speaking that way has nothing clever to say!
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
hair down there is just natural, nothing gross with it. but most people have such washed minds by massmedia...jeezz...they found natural look disgusting! )) what will be then with people?
I personally dont like shaved men down there and btw it bites my skin if he press to me in bed (I have thing skin).
I personally dont like shaved men down there and btw it bites my skin if he press to me in bed (I have thing skin).
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
If no bush then that mean u slept with many guys because guys love no bush!! I don' trust with any ladies with no bush on!! NO DISCUSS WITH ME PERIOD!
RE: For the girls: Bush or no bush?
Well I don't like to discuss the woman's period either, but sometimes you just gotta.
As for hair or no hair, it's all a matter of preference. I like it all ways, 1, 5, or 10. The hair down there means extra effort on cleanliness and hygiene, I suppose. But each has its aesthetics, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. Sometimes it's just plain nice not getting hair in the teeth, tho ::D
As for hair or no hair, it's all a matter of preference. I like it all ways, 1, 5, or 10. The hair down there means extra effort on cleanliness and hygiene, I suppose. But each has its aesthetics, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. Sometimes it's just plain nice not getting hair in the teeth, tho ::D
RE: Viewers' opinions on "Chathosts: Make-up, no make-up, or do you even care?"
I must confess I never really look if the host wears make-up or not. It is not THAT important to me, so I never really thought about it untill now. I recall some hosts have lipstick and have possible done some around their eyes. I once saw a host how had overdone the make-up..it was rather funny, but she got upset and quit me..lol
RE: Viewers' opinions on "Chathosts: Make-up, no make-up, or do you even care?"
Hmm...that's an interesting question :) Well...
Short answer, do whatever you can, that helps you to look your best.
More detailed...depends also on how good you are at it...generally less or no makeup is better for me...but it Can be helpful.
Here's a thought..probably a good idea for cc because we know that people on TV need to wear makeup so their face dosen't get washed out..so they just simply Show Up better.
There was a beautiful nude model I'd seen in magazines, etc...she appeared on a cam site...obviously no makeup...and sorry, but fact is, she looked way better with it on.
Again though, you have to be good at it..I've seen ladies with...hmm..how to describe..foreign subject to me...they use a dark makeup pen or something...there's a visible line around outline of face...they turn sideways, and you can see this clearly...that looks Horrible....or base or foundation makeup I guess it is...if your face color dosen't match say your neck color, that can look bad too.
So if you're good at applying it, I'd say go for it, otherwise no.
I'll say this too...it's a good question, because to me..as far as looks alone are concerned: lovely face is equally as important as hot body.
Anyway, there you go. Hope you have a great one :)
Short answer, do whatever you can, that helps you to look your best.
More detailed...depends also on how good you are at it...generally less or no makeup is better for me...but it Can be helpful.
Here's a thought..probably a good idea for cc because we know that people on TV need to wear makeup so their face dosen't get washed out..so they just simply Show Up better.
There was a beautiful nude model I'd seen in magazines, etc...she appeared on a cam site...obviously no makeup...and sorry, but fact is, she looked way better with it on.
Again though, you have to be good at it..I've seen ladies with...hmm..how to describe..foreign subject to me...they use a dark makeup pen or something...there's a visible line around outline of face...they turn sideways, and you can see this clearly...that looks Horrible....or base or foundation makeup I guess it is...if your face color dosen't match say your neck color, that can look bad too.
So if you're good at applying it, I'd say go for it, otherwise no.
I'll say this too...it's a good question, because to me..as far as looks alone are concerned: lovely face is equally as important as hot body.
Anyway, there you go. Hope you have a great one :)
RE: Viewers' opinions on "Chathosts: Make-up, no make-up, or do you even care?"
A genuine smile will do more for me than $1000 worth of cosmetics. You can put me in the no-makeup camp.
RE: Viewers' opinions on "Chathosts: Make-up, no make-up, or do you even care?"
makeup sometimes and no makeup sometimes-depends on the occasion-but if your talking about here on cc during a video-i agree with JTK a smile and eyes that are looking right at me during the video when chatting means a lot.
RE: Viewers' opinions on "Chathosts: Make-up, no make-up, or do you even care?"
The trick of make-up (esp professionally for video and shows) is that it should do its job and we arent even aware it's there. I'm sure many beautiful hosts here still manage to enhance esp their eyes and we're all fooled. In that case we're all in favour of make-up while we think we're voting for none.
That's not to deny the slutty look gets my dick stirring too. Everything does.
That's not to deny the slutty look gets my dick stirring too. Everything does.
RE: Viewers' opinions on "Chathosts: Make-up, no make-up, or do you even care?"
I am only concerned with clothes or no clothes.