General Forum

At the risk of revealing my advanced age: "All Day Music" by War. Always puts me in the right frame of mind.

"Inhale" or "Bother" by Stone Sour :-)

Beethoven's 9th Symphony

So many to choose from. Shine on You Crazy Diamond - Pink Floyd jumps into my head first so I will put that.

n/a

comfortably numb :)

n/a

Depending on what I'm chilling from, Higher than the sun - Primal Scream, High and Dry - Radiohead, Sideways - Citizen Cope or The Blowers Daughter - Damien Rice

n/a

n/a

Groove Armada-Paris, Gothan Project-Queremos pas-2 the most amazing things, ive heard)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

'How Much Is That Doggie In The Window' by the Beverley Sisiters

These Foolish Things.... Frank Sinatra

Telepopmusik, Breathe.

Amazing track.

n/a

n/a

n/a

1. Righteous Brothers - Unchained Melody
2. UB40 - Can't help falling in love

n/a

n/a

Trans Siberian Orchestra's "Beethoven's Last Night" The whole CD

hmmm....so many to choose from.... but pretty much anything from the Temptations

n/a

lol

n/a

Addis Black Widow - Innocent
John Holt - Police in helicopter
Kultiration - Propaganda

one of those... maybe.

Ofiget! Pardon my french but it is difficult to find a more generalised question in this area. It is like asking a stranger which girl you should pick among 1 million beautiful ones (assuming you qualify for any of them;)

If you say 'I am going to Asia' then are you just wanting to go to any country in Asia at all? Everything from Uzbekistan to North Korea?
Or are you asking which country/countries to choose? And how long do you plan to go? Even seeing all one single country has to offer is enough to full a vacation - and for the bigger ones such as China and India, it is enough to fill several vacations. While I have only been to two countries so far - Vietnam and China, I still find myself wishing to visit at least three more - Thailand, Laos and Cambodia.

It helps a lot if you would mention what your interests are. Temples? Nautre? Trekking? Elephant trips? River cruises? Beaches? Or does your identity here refer to other things you are looking for?

Again, there are millions of places to go. A tiny hint of more specific interests would help a great deal...

Thanks for the reply. I know my question was really generalised but that was the point. Asia is so vast that if I started looking at all the places I'd like to visit I'd end up needing to be on vacation for years.
This is why I wanted to hear of others experiences first hand. Places they have been to that are a must see. I'm hoping to put together a vacation based on such recommendations and looking to do as much as possible .
So far based on a couple of recommendations I've already received I'm thinking of doing Thailand and Laos.
Failing this I may just choose a month's package holiday, but I'd rather do things myself.

Well, based on your suggestions of Thailand and Laos, I will jot down my previously made in-my-mind trip that I considered last year, although it is still only on the planning stage, and certainly changeable.

I considered a combination of Thailand and Laos.

By the way, you still do not mention what your main interests are, if any, so my itinerary is what in my eyes would be a good combination of culture, sights, temples, nature and other experiences.

Start off - fly to Bangkok, stay there for 4-5 days - there is a lot to see, so maybe even this is little - depending on if you want to see a lot.
Grand Palace - an absolute must. There's a death penalty if you go to Bangkok and do not see this. Seriously :P And add in Wat Pho at the same time. Half day to full day, depending on if you are an eager photographer like me and like to spend a lot of time for some nice shots (if you can get any good ones with the throngs of people).
A boat trip along the Chao Praya river, including a visit to Wat Arun - Temple of Dawn. Or in addition (needs an early start): visit the floating market outside the city - certainly a genuine experience of 'old times'.
A full day trip to Ayutthaya, Thailand's former capital, sacked by the Burmese, thereby resulting in - Bangkok. Still, it houses a lot of mostly well preserved ruins (no golden roofs anymore, sadly). Most visitors here combine it with a visit to the Bang-Pa In Summer Palace further south.
Maybe you want to visit the River Kwai and see the infamous railroad stretch made by POWs for Japan, who occupied this part of Thailand back then.
Experience the hustle and bustle of Bangkok too - ride a tuk-tuk and breathe in the polluted air - or go with the skytrain (very easy to get around with). Visit the market areas, or the big shopping malls, such as MBK.
A possible side trip - the park to the south of the city which houses smaller replicas of famous places/buildings from all around the country. But if you plan to go around a lot, maybe this will be a waste of time..*shrug*

Next, I would consider going north - there is a possibility to stop over at Sukhotai in central Thailand, which is similar to Ayutthaya. But if you fear your trip will give you an overdose of historic temple areas, you may want to skip it.
Because you should go to Chiang Mai, a smaller city which houses almost as many temples as the capital. And it is said that it is fairly tranquil and pleasant.
I would also recommend Chiang Rai, gateway to the Golden Triangle. From here, you can go elephant trekking, regular hiking, or maybe even cross into Burma (you may want to check if it is easy and/or safe first...) But do visit the fairly new (still under construction) white temple - Wat Rong Khun - it looks absolutely amazing (in fact I would add this on my own trip just to go here alone, as the rest of the Chiang Rai area doesn't appeal to me).
When in the north/northeast, it is short to Laos - from here, you can visit Vientiane, the capital, but I would definitely also recommend Luang Prabang - said to be one of the world's most beautiful places.

After all this, I would consider going for a slightly more relaxing place and would add a few days in the south of Thailand. Many go to Phuket, but it is very touristy (I will not even mention Pattaya), but I would instead recommend Krabi - less developed, less touristy, more genuine, and more beautiful nature right outside your door.
Add 2-3 full days here, and visit the beautiful Phi Phi Island as well as Railay Beach (the setting for the movie 'The Beach' - even though it wasn't pretty enough for the filmmakers - they changed a few things). Also, go on a regular trip in the gulf, and see the spectacular caves and limestone rocks rising straight out of the sea. Do not miss Koh Tapu (also called James Bond Island, used in 'The Man With The Golden Gun').
And maybe add one day for relaxing before heading back to Bangkok and the return home.

Well..it's a suggestion.

I would recommend getting good guidebooks. I have two on Thailand - Dorling Kindersley - because they have lots of great pics - and Footprint - very good at going deeper with. I do not have any on Laos yet though, mainly because the visit would not be big.

For accommodation, I always use Tripadvisor and always with a grain of salt. Finding a place to stay one which matches your tastes and budget should be easy, Bangkok is one of the cities where you get the most Bang for your buck (Kok? Excuse the pun..)

Happy planning, and remember: half the fun is planning itself!

Mr T.

That is absolutely fantastic. In fact it was much more than I expected.

I have copied your suggestions over and will research everything you have recommended. It's a superb starting point.

Thank You very much!

Had a good day in Tehran 8 years ago, friendly people and great restaurant in the evening - not joking either was very good but for the pollution

Thanks, I'll have a read up about it.

You seem more confident about the portuguese team than we do lol

Funnily, the "forca" (also means "hang rope" lol) is what's expecting them if they don't qualify :))

n/a

n/a

The way we did play yesterday..omg.. It was hard to play agains noth of corea! I still want believe we are going win the world cup..;).

Forca.. Brasil / USA and Portugal ..

xoxoxoxo

Vuvuzelas ! Yes,they're South African.Everyone seems to hate 'em.Personally,I love a lively crowd.Perhaps if you're on the stadium the noise can be a bit annoying,but even that's better than lame cheerleaders with fluffy pom-poms

The horns are stupid! If they blew them just at certain moments such as a goal, that would makes sense. But they blow them 100% of the game. It is like a bunch of little kids given a toy that they play with for 90 minutes non-stop. The problem is that unlike a little kid, they don't get bored with it and keep playing them the next game too.

It isn't a lively crowd enjoying a game. It is a bunch of people enjoying that they have a big event and want to blow their stupid horns to celebrate. Fine. I get the point. You got the World Cup.

Get your heads into the game! Focus on what is happening on the field. Don't focus on other distractions like cheerleaders, horns, whatever. These people are NOT true sports fans, and their actions take away from others' ability to enjoy the game. A real sports fan wouldn't have time to be distracted by stupid things like horns.

Oh yes haha i agree with u abt cheerleaders))))

I dont care abt horns, i dont think i even notice them a lot as im usually concentrated on the game, just like, im sure, any other football fan:)

Well, I can concentrate on the game, but a real football fan at the stadium wouldn't be distracted and need to play a stupid horn. It is just annoyiing.

I don't care how much of a fan you are, it takes away from somebody's ability to enjoy the game. I suppose if I saw MonikaBabe walking down the street and people were blowing horns (as I am sure they would), I wouldn't be distracted, but sorry, I still find them annoying during the game.

n/a

n/a

It sounds like a swarm of bees inside the tv.

n/a

don't worry - by all accounts this world cup is a failure. it will be 2070 before africa gets another chance. bad weather, lots of empty seats, expensive airfare, lousy accommodations and public transportation, no thanks....today even the security forces for the stadiums went on strike...I can't wait for 2014 in Brazil!

1. I don't think you can write off a whole continent by one event

2. Brasil gets the Olympics and the World Cup? wow

Agree about writing off a whole continent, and I remember lots of group games in Italia 90 where there were lots of empty seats, and in Japan/Korea in 02 as well, and don't remember anyone questioning the wisdom of a world cup there

n/a

in addition transportation to and from the venues has been a mess.

Well its winter so what do you expect ? Accomadation is tops fans are having a ball here its one big party . Trasoprtation is a bit of a mess but no one is complaining compared to the us or korea this world cup is 10000% better im loving it . Stadiums are the best . And recreation visitors are having a ball

i agree with you it is annoying.but it is a part of african fan culture,i think we must accept it.if you want to make the noise a bit lower,try to change the sound (equalizer) of your TV.

n/a

If horn blowing was, for example, part of some type of special ceremony, I would accept it. But we are talking about a football game, and no matter how much people love football, it is just a sport, nothing more. Unless you want to tell me that horn blowing is some type of sacred ritual at public events, I am not going to give it the same type of respect as things such religion and other cultural differences.

n/a

n/a

Dude... i was unlucky to have one of those blowing just 1 meter away from me today and i cant tell you that all i wanted was to shove that damn vovuzela up that fu**** ass!!

Now imagine having thousands of those together in a football stadium... jeeez...

let them play them during south africa's games. They are fu$%^&cking annoying.

n/a

I hate the vuvuzela too it shpuld be banned )))

it's funny, i found those horns annoying at first too, but the more that people cry and complain about them, players, especially, the more i kind of love them:)

tight game .

n/a

n/a

2-1 brasil, not very impressive for Brasil

n/a

n/a

It was an amazing first goal, but Brasil cant be too happy with their performance, North Korea and their Dear leader Kim Hung Lo are ranked 104th. I would like to know what the brazilian press is saying about their performance.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

will you take it off if they win to celebrate?

n/a

both teams play tomorrow

n/a

Was such a boring game, and this cry baby Ronaldo again jeez....Shame that Drogba isnt in his best shape due to the injury(( I was hoping that he wud score(( Hope Cote d'ivoire will do better next time:)

n/a

I know that he is a good player but he is still a cry baby, its annoying:) Just run next to him-he will fall and act like he will die any moment! He needs to be in soap operas lol, they will love him there)) And Drogba is awsome indeed, one of the best!

one of the things i hate about football is the flopping and crying; another ...games are foten played where teams play to tie and/or not to lose. I'd rather watch paint dry.

I'd rather watch sports where teams try to win rather than play to tie or to lose by a certain goal differential..

Go for it. Noone forces u to watch football;)

it was either be vuzueled or forced to watch Cote D'Ivoire/Portugal, i mistakenly chose the match and got both and had the pleasure of seeing a team tied 1-1 in the closing seconds of the match with one player writihing on the ground as if he had been struck down by a machete(Academy award material!) and the his teammate decide to not kick a corner that could possibly win the game. Tie! That is excitement!

oops sorry it wasnt even that exciting, it was 0-0, maybe I was imagining it was more enjoyable :-)

n/a

erm no)) 0-0))

n/a

No more candy for you :(

lol

n/a

Not if it was very general it wouldn't

Like his screen name? Maybe they don't want to be known by their neighbors just as I don't want my neighbors knowing I am here.....or for that matter....my grandmother, father, sister, mother.....lol the list goes on and I don't want them having my contact info either....lmao!!

Are you in hiding from your grandmother, father, sister and mother that you do not want them having your contact info :P

my point.....maybe the Scotsmen don't want to visit with their neighbors on here as I would not.....it's called being anonymous on a porn site :) Perhaps he should consider posting on the Viewers Forum and let them respond to him rather than asking hosts :) And my final answer to him is yes I do know a couple of Scotsmen on here.....

Phil McCavity?.....ok, old (& poor) joke I know!

LOL

There you are. You answered his question. Now I'm sure the neighbours and families of those two scotsmen still do not know who they are.

It wasn't as if he was asking for names, addresses, ages, national insurance numbers etc

I'm sure with all that porridge most of them are "regular"! :)

LOLLL

Of course! All guys from your place our regular's here! ;-)

sorry I do not trust men in skirts with no pants

hehe...what about girls in short skirts with no pants? ))

good point but they have more attractive parts than the meat and two vegitables or a hairy scot!

mine is doing the same thing. one minute the ladies are there and the next they are gone .And my email is messed up too.

That sounds more like my real life :(

refreshing favourites being compared to picking scabs,a most unfortunate analogy i guess :--)

Not at all, not at all....they both serve to satisfy an "itch," after all......

lmao,point well taken :--)

me too... i just posted in the tech forum... it's happening with the online list of hosts too....

about 12 hours ago, i think cc had some type of problem... hosts were getting disconnected and stuff... i guess they are working on it. about 12 hours ago, i got d/c two times in vid and moved to a new host and after awhile, i couldn't see what she typed

Oh thank God it is CC. I thought I was having some acid flashbacks from the 60's. And was the music playing on CC White Rabbitt?

one page says she's offline, and one page says she's on call.... and the nonadult hosts that you see, don't do anything at all.... go ask a viewer... when his c*ck is just small....

i suppose :p

n/a

White Rabbit - Jefferson Airplane (probably on youtube... search for it)

One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
Go ask Alice
When she's ten feet tall

And if you go chasing rabbits
And you know you're going to fall
Tell 'em a hookah smoking caterpillar
Has given you the call
Call Alice
When she was just small

When men on the chessboard
Get up and tell you where to go
And you've just had some kind of mushroom
And your mind is moving slow
Go ask Alice
I think she'll know

When logic and proportion
Have fallen sloppy dead
And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's "off with her head!"
Remember what the dormouse said;
"Keep YOUR HEAD
Keep your head"

That is what I was thinking! Do you play bass guitar? Just curious :)

I play my own special instrument. Perhaps you have seen me do it in video.

Maybe....but I haven't HEARD it produce music :)

I play the organ.....and what is better than roses on a piano?....tulips on an organ

Listen more carefully, and I am sure that you will.... And anyway, truly beautiful music is felt., and you certainly can feel my instrument. I know that I have, lol.

n/a

You have obviously never watched womens Tae Kwan do or karate.

n/a

You may take it as an insult but it helps you, any fool who messed with you expecting you to fight like a girl would get a rude supprise.

n/a

hmmmmm. part of me is turned on, but the other part thinks a guy wrote that so i am a bit worried, lol.

Well...Meow, meow. meow.. lol

i have seen many guys fight like that too.

No way ... pulling hair as their first act in a fight ? hmmmmm maybe at the Toupee Club :)))) or a Gay hairdressers convention :)) i doubt at the Afro Club ....... and certainly not at the pacifist hippie club :))

sure mostly basket weavers or basketballers,lol

Someone once said if women fought wars they would be over in 2 weeks...a testament to their ferocity and focus.

Just in time for the sales to start :P

LMFAO

n/a

n/a

n/a

Best for a girl's self defense would be some actual proven art like Judo, Jiujitsu or Sambo.
Most Kung fu styles will get you killed against a resisting opponent.

judo is proven? it's a sport style dude. and jiu-jitsu is outdated. same problem as with a lot of kung-fu styles, it's lost it's connection to reality. sword defense training won't help you in most bar brawls ;)

n/a

n/a

:-(

I think you are kissofheaven

why would you think it's her?

I agree that you shouldn't get a low rating just because you won't strip when not required to strip. If you were in glamour or litte shy and said u don't strip, I would NEVER give you a lower rating because of that. And I still might visit you and chat awhile, and most likely give you 5 stars unless you were being rude or something.

But read the posts again when guys complain. Yeah, some guys are idiots and demand glamour or little shy hosts (or even a nonadult host from what I hear) to strip, and give 1 star if she won't. But others are angry when hosts promise things and don't deliver, stall simply to make more money, don't comply with category rules, et cetera.

The member in your example was wrong and you are correct to be upset. But often it is the other way around.

n/a

any host that doesn't strip should get low ratings.

What is your basis for saying this? - or are you just trying to jerk everyone's chains?

This place is for stripping, and all of a sudden we have to spend half our time and too much money just finding out if it will happen. No thanks. Low ratings for not stripping, and hopefully I'll never get that far down the page. You guys that like it can spend your time looking for the "no no"s.

n/a

There are many, many dating sites on the internet, but this is not one of them. Lots of guys think it is, and lots of hosts make big money because of that. Go ahead and treat it like one. I won't stop you. I will continue to hope that hosts who don't strip are lower on the page.

No one is saying this is a dating site. Just that different members like different types of shows, There are categories here that cater for exactly what you need. Marking down hosts in the softcore categories just because they will not immediately strip for you screws up their rating for them and the rest of us. Your attitude is totally selfish and that makes you ....a jerk.

It is unfortunate for you and others that you don't have the intelligence or the understanding to figure out the simple concept of this site or other sites similar, for that matter. The site owners obviously have it figured out to cater to the wants of all.... not just YOU with your limited thoughts. It is sad that you are out to change the site one host at a time! Why don't you block yourself from softcore and non-adult and you would be much more satisfied as well!! Otherwise you are just out to be a jerk! I agree with A Member and I am sure many do.
You sound like a very angry person...and you're going to take it out on others...

n/a

I didn't say anything about immediately. I like teasing, and I'm OK dealing with a host who takes her time. You want me to stay away from Glamour and Little shy, but the vast majority of hosts there strip, and that works for me.

There are lots of levels of stripping, and there is no reason that I should be relegated to Not So Shy. However, the landscape of those two categories is littered with a few hosts who make money based on the fact that members expect them to strip.

Go ahead and make a place for all those "shows" that you say so many members like to see. Let's see how long that lasts, when the hosts aren't getting money they don't deserve, from members who expect stripping.

These hosts are getting a few dollars every time a member stumbles in and doesn't realize they won't strip. Those dollars add up, and allow them to get away with that strategy.

You didn't make the rules at CC and yet you are deciding what hosts should do to please you!! You are speaking from your own simple mind and yet you don't speak for the majority! Obviously others are happy with the plan for Glam and Shy and instead of using the rating system inappropriately....you don't deserve the right to go into a hosts room when she says "no strip". Your defending your selfish actions and causing pain for others which is being a jerk....no regard for another. In fact sounds like you intentionally go into those two category's to misuse your ability to rate hosts and cause them undo hurt.......You don't get it! Further you are not a host in those categories to know what men like......Jerk!
Just remember .......what you do to others...always comes back around in life eventually.

n/a

I see.....so you can't get a date from a glam, shy girl or non-adult so you're going to ruin it for all!!! Very logical thinking....LOL! Grow up...you're not going to change the site to your twisted way of thinking....you WILL just piss off a lot of people.... Then again if your thing is you like to be verbally abused....there is a section for that too....LOL!

I'm not looking to change the site. The rating system is there and I use it. If you think I'm the only one then good luck with that.

You ruin it for both members and hosts in those categories because you are wrong in assuming that all members think like you! Others aren't rating on if a host strips or not when they go to Glam or non-adult and ESPECIALLY when she clearly tells you in her post or chat.
You are ignorant and certainly did not get any of the information to support your claims based on anything that CC has written.

Also, for your information Hosts can turn in members for intentionally rating them low when they specified what they don't do. Also, hosts discuss between themselves and before long the "blocking system" works very well for members that abuse their rating privledges for the sole purpose to hurt hosts and misrepresent them.

Who said anything about all members? If i am alone then what are you worried about? You claim to have a "ring" of hosts who have been targeting members already, so I will leave it to you to police this site.

My rating is my opinion. C.C. has not given me any rules about how to form my opinion. However, feel free to "turn me in".

If a host has a few pictures in her profile that don't look good because of no make up, etc, then I go into her video and she looks ugly because she didn't bother to wake up, shower, and get ready to work, am I obligated to rate her high because I had warning from her profile? Will you attack me with your dreaded "turn me in" strategy? If another member likes girls who look this way, does that mean "I" have to agree and make my rating higher?

If I buy a car and somewhere in the manual it says that the top speed is 60 km per hour, I don't have to rate that car high because someone else likes cars that only go that fast. I have my own opinion, and I don't care that if I read the manual I would know it. Most cars go faster than that, and I don't want to read the manual to make sure mine will too. I won't get my money back, and I'm not asking for my money back. I'm just giving it a low rating, because I DON'T LIKE IT.

Most hosts here are EARNING their money. A few, and it certainly sounds like you are one of them, are making money that they don't deserve because they are swimming in the same pool and taking advantage of it.

It all works out fine in the end, and I don't need to change anything in c.c. I can rate hosts low if they do not provide a service that I like.

n/a

You are clearly the type of guy referred to in the title. "This place" which you seem to think you are an authority on has never been only about stripping. If there is one thing "this place" has always been about it is freedom and range of choice for both hosts and members. No host in Glamour or Littleshy deserves a low rating simply because she will not strip. A host in non-adult should not strip at all.

Very well said!

n/a

n/a

guys can be such bastards,except the gay ones :--)

yes I agree with tisme-he is my lover

it's the sweetness of your words that won my heart.how you won my ass is a different answer :--)

It was the big round redness, like a baboon that did it for me :-))

n/a

Well yeah im pretty sure that was him that voted me bad...im pretty new around here and i had no problems with any of the members here..I got voted bad twice ... the first one told me he was gonna give mea bad vote cause he found me anoyng and i didn;t understand why he kept returning over and over since i was such a pain in the ass...and i could see the rating going bad the second day after his private...and then this guy last night...im not here often and 99 % of my privates are with regurlars... last night that guy was the exception from the rule...and this morning...rating went bad...

ask a host how to block members although he can make a new account... however, at that point, if you think there is a problem with his voting, write to cc... they can see how everyone votes

No one is suggesting you should be forced into something you don't want to do...particularly getting naked. If you make it clear you do not strip then the member should respect that and not enter the video expecting you to change your mind. However, I think the comments you are reading are about hosts who specifically promise or strongly suggest they would get naked and after several minutes of video and stalling they announce they changed their mind, or they are not in the mood, or the member must have understood the phrase...Yes I will get naked to mean that the host will strip. Again, a host can say ...look..I changed my mind. But the member has the right to tell CC and get a full refund. Do we all agree on that? You make a deal...if both parties go through with it...everyone is happy.

Yes agree....honest communication by both parties = all to be happy :)
Unfortunately there are people that abuse "respect and communication" on both sides.....this is a problem and they should be beheaded....lol. This is not the majority either direction so let's make them know this is unacceptable....

Are you sure he gave you one star because you didn't get naked? Perhaps he gave you one star because you said that you wanted to go to bed instead of continuing to chat with him in private. Did you get so bored that you couldn't take his money any more?

about ratings... maybe some members use this rating system how it was ment to be used, and i think original purpose for rating scale was that 1 = really poor, 3 = average, 5 = excellent... so when someone give 3 star it dont have mean he didnt like your show, it just mean it wasnt one of the best shows he have seen.

not sure how that got in here but.....that certainly isn't the way hosts see it or members looking for a host. A "3" rating would be considered a poor rating which would only be deserved if she was rude, disinterested or on the phone part of the video.... You are wrong about that one!!

yes i know most think it like that, but then why have scale from 1 to 5, if options are just poor or good?
If 3 is poor, then what is 2 and 1 for? every adult person understand that if rating scale is 1 to 5 it is not ment to give everyone 5 or 1 star

n/a

n/a

Some girls in Glam for instant sit there naked in open or use toys.... Why can't I ever find these girls?

the problem with your complaint is I can count on one hand the number of girls who said they don't strip or get naked and actually didn't strip or get naked when I saw them in their video. Most of the ones I've seen who say they don't get naked end up getting naked, so that could be why it's hard for members to take the "I don't get naked" line all that seriously.

But it should be respected when a girl says no.....it means NO....not maybe....:)

Ice hockey is over, Stanley Cup us awarded so there's no sports to watch until next October

n/a

I am not sure if "the groups" means the next round, but if it does, I cannot believe that England and the USA (unless the goalie is hurt) won't at least move on to the next round. After that, I think it is single elimination so it could be one and done for both of them if they aren't careful.

Ultimately, for both, the issue is can they win the cup, and I doubt it, but it was just one game and I am far from an expert. I just watch a lot of sports and can tell when a team "has it" and when they don't. The USA obviously does not have what a team needs to go far in all liklihood, and the fact that England didn't win something like 3 - 0 or 3 - 1 given how many opportunities they had tells me they won't go far either. Championship teams capitalize on opportunities, and England did not. It was one game, but a championship team really should come out and be playing at its best, or at least a lot better, in a tournament like this. It isn't like it is the beginning of a season. These guys are all familiar with each other and should have done better. But perhaps they were with their league teams and are a little rusty in terms of being on the same page. We shall see, but both teams better be looking their best out of this round or they might as well pack it up and go home. They each have two games to get their acts together otherwise, they might as well go home now.

A draw is a draw is a draw. We might actually get out of the operning round. Cool beans. Go USA.... Thank god the English goalie isn't Colombian or they would be digging the grave now....

I remember that. That poor Colombian who scored an own goal and was murdered for it when he returned home. Sad when people take this game that seriously.

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yeah, all that and England still couldn't win. They must really be awful.

That's why it's called footBALL, no?

... and not footBALLS lol

LOL Now that would be something fun to watch!

why is FOOTball, footBALL, or FOOTBALL, however you want to call it, even called a "sport" ????

n/a

n/a

A Romanian sport of which I am unaware, perhaps? I hope so and I hope to learn of it and become and very big fan soon. Imagining a sport in which teams of men run around kicking each other is quite delightful.

so using your logic,thinking,in sports where they use their hands it should be a gropefest :--)

Your mind seems to have quickly gone to a very definite place. I applaud your wonderfully creative way of thinking.

You can kick another player but only in the balls and only if the ref is not watching and he is smaller than you.

Obviously never saw football in the 70's, used to kick the shit out of each over, Claudio Gentile on Maradona 1982 world cup, kicked the crap out of him.

Well im not from England unfortunatelly, but im with them with all my heart))))) My fav team ever!! U rock guys!!!!!

i think u better give their keeper some extra loving after yesterday

As always your preferences the Brits :-P

i'm not from england but i want you to finish top of your group so we can kick your ass in the round of 16 :--)

n/a

and it's taken you how long to have this epiphany?thanks for sharing your enlightment :--)

It comes down to who has the power. But at the end of the day the hosts have your money. So your figure it out.

n/a

Lets not fool ourselves. The vast majority of members come here for nudity and the vast majority of host must deliver nudity in order to make money. Simple. While there are some members who are seeking chat only or non sexual contact they are the minority. Same with hosts who don't strip...there are a few (I am not talking about the scammers who lie about stripping)...but most hosts know they have to strip or just sit in front ot their computer all night doing nothing.

So......what is your point? You do not know what the members want as well as the hosts do darling so don't speak for the majority :) My point is there is something for ALL to enjoy and many different options so don't put a host in a position where she has told you otherwise (there are a few that are liars just like members) and then create a bad rating when she doesn't do what she said she wouldn't do.....

n/a

Believe it or not but not all members want instant naked or even naked....that is why there are so many choices......you want naked got to Hardcore and get naked! Too many whiners on here......

n/a

Yep, and because we love variety so much we want to see nudity in every category possible ;)

you're enthusiasm is too much.. i now have no choice but to root against argentina.
sorry, but your team is now doomed.

n/a

n/a

Argentina barely beat an injured riddled Nigerian team. Woopee.

The Nigerian keeper did a great job. Two great saves. It would have been 3-0 otherwise. Argentina looked good and played well. Even Maradona seemed to be pretty good. Capricorn...lets go to La Cabrera in Palermo and have a nice bife de chorizo and some malbec to celebrate.

will be interesting when they play south korea.they'll have even more running to do than today :--)

n/a

not saying they don't,but,in the first half nigeria weren't competitive (lucky it was only 1-0)the longer the game went the more nigeria was able to make impression& towards the end they even had chances. to me the koreans are even fitter & faster than them,play a more uptempo game.i think it will be interesting how argentina copes with that :--)

n/a

n/a

n/a

Under my policy, a woman would have 3 ways to enter the USA:

1. She is hot and is approved by at least 6 of the 10 judges. In such a case, she would get a one year visa whereby she would have one year to get married or she would be permanently banned from ever entering the USA.

2. She is not so hot and is only approved by a 5 or fewer judges but does have some redeeming qualities such as she is a doctor, nurse, et cetera and can serve some useful purpose here. In such a case, she could get a work visa for a period to be determined by the panel.

3. She could come by way of the current tourist visa rules.

In terms of your question, therefore, if you are a hot host, you would fall under method 1 or method 3. It would not matter that you could cure cancer or serve some other purpose. My administration simply would not care. If you're hot, and if you chose to go before the judges, you have agreed to the one year limit after which you must be married or leave forever.

Even if you think you are hot, if you go before the panel of judges and get 5 votes or less, then you can still come for a longer period. In this case, however, you would need to be able to perform some useful service such as being a doctor or whatever. If you are hot, we really don't care what you can do. You are already providing a useful service if you choosed to move to the USA by marrying one of us, but you must do so within 1 year. (You must be a faithful wife for at least 10 years or more by the way, or back where you came from!) After you are married, if you want to go save the world, fine, but first you must get married within one year.

If you don't want to go before the judging panel, you still can get a tourist visa and visit, but that can be hard depending upon where you are from. But if you want to stay for a longer period, you MUST go before the panel of judges and your fate will be decided by them. All I can say is that if you are hot feel that you have a skill of some type that the USA needs and want to try for a work visa, you will need to reduce your hotness by not wearing makeup, not sleeping enough, wearing old clothes, et cetera and making the judges think you are not hot. At that point, you will have the opportunity to explain that you have some other value and the judges may let you in anyway. But be forewarned... These judges will be CC members and have done things like seen a host when she first gets online without makeup, awakened her by entering video, et cetera and they will be able to tell that you are hotter than you are trying to let on.

n/a

n/a

Anybody but Obama

Sure, can I be on the committee ;)

And who says I'm going to give up my seat?

We, the people, in order to form a more perfect union!

However, if you choose to adopt my plan, I will withdrawl my candidacy. Otherwise, the clock is ticking. You have until January 20, 2013, and I might even start a movement to pressure the House to impeach you and the Senate to then remove you!!!

We want our hosts!!!

n/a

n/a

Maybe you don't but all other active hosts have the US blocked for privacy reasons. And to honest, have no idea why you don't as well.

n/a

n/a

Strange, I thought you already considered yourself The Greatest People (TM) so why would you need to go with the "let's import the most beautiful women from country X, Y and Z and then nuke what's left of it" attitude?
Thankfully, many are better informed than that.

"The Greatest People(TM)"?
Really now?

Direct quote from a certain former president, so yes - really now.

oh good god

Since when has the word "amongst" snuck into the common vocabulary of real modern day Americans?

You, sir, are very obviously an imposter.

otherwise it had the right combination of schmaltz,horse hockey & total bulldust to be american? :--)

have the right combination of condescension, prissiness, and false sense of intellectual superiority, to be a dick.

First, there is nothing wrong with saying "amongst".

Second, I made a few errors here and there such as saying "choosed", instead of "chose", but that just means I was typing fast and not being careful, not that I am not an American.

Double negative I am sorry !
and of course English

n/a

how different is this american team from the one that stopped spain's 35 game unbeaten streak last year?
surely this american team is being given better odds against an unimpressive english team than they were given to beat spain in last year's confederations cup, right?

The USA have lost striker Charlie Davies who was the star of the Confederation Cup and have a couple of other injury problems. England have peformed poorly in recent friendlies but since Capello took over have done well in competitive matches. Of course USA have a chance, especially if England have an off day, but if the England players perform at or close to their best they should win.

Lol i hope u understand that it was more of an exception than rule, and that it was pure luck, right?)))))) Happened once, so please, dont act like from now on it will be always this way lol)) So funny)

so you're saying that the "rule" in football is that the team most people favour to win always wins ... unless they don't, in which case it's pure luck for them to have been beaten?
err ... sure, ok.

so, anyway ... better luck next time england.

I bet you don't find it so funny now :D

read again, i didnt say anything about "rules" or any other not popular teams:) I was talking abt USA and Spain))) One of the best, greatest teams in the world, of the coutry where football is religion, art, style of living, and USA, where its a so-called game for "pussies, girls and kids?". U really think that it wasnt luck in the case? Lol if u do then ok nvm))))

As for this game with England, if u saw the game u sshould know that the result was like this mostly not cuz USA is so good, but cuz the English goalkeeper screwed up:) It was a lame, weak shoot, and he still managed to let the ball off his hands..And i call it luck for the USA lol. But i have to admit that the american goalkeeper is good, he saved his team lots of times, but thats it. We will see what happens next:) Was just the first game so..Time will show:)

It is easy to put the blame on the English keeper for his error but in reality the whole team should share it. I barely think of a single player whose performance was particularly good. Maybe Johnson and Gerard. Aaron Lennon was especially poor, considering the quality of the opposition full back. The one positive thing is that surely Rooney cannot have another game as bad as this for the tournamant. I just hope he doesn't try too hard in the next match and get sent off. The selection of Milner was a mistake, he was clearly not fit enough.

Well sure the whole team wasnt so good, but what i am saying is that if Green didnt miss that absolutly lame goal(btw the same happened today with the Algerian goalkeeper, he must be Green's cousin lol)l, England wud win no? Even if they played as they played, Stivie G still scored. Sure they werent in their best form, and they looked kinda tired, but still if not that stupid mistake of the goalie-they'd win. I just hope they will learn from this experience and next time we will see the game that we expect from them.

But the "stupid mistake" happened so saying England would have won if it hadn't is just nonsense. I could just as easily say if England hadn't scored their first goal the USA would have won which would be equally stupid.

My point is that if England had played better both individually and as a team they would have scored more goals so Green's mistake would not have cost them the game. When a forward makes a mistake he fails to score. Comments may be made but not at the same level as when a goalkeeper blunders because this usually results in a goal being conceded.

http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/ranking/lastranking/gender=m/fullranking.html

England is 8, USA 14. I think that is rankings in general, not for the tournament, but I don't really know.

Who cares?

n/a

England, ofc))

n/a

Didn't Know We had a USA Soccer team . . .

I knew we did, we won the World Cup at least once or twice recently.
I was just surprised to learn this past week that men actually played soccer.

n/a

men play a sport where they wear more padding than a flat chested,no ass streetwalker :--)

Won the World Cup once or twice recently???)))))))))))))) Is it what they tell u on TV?)))) Rofl)))))))

Btw, do you know why England only got a draw against USA?

Because their keeper is still...



Green!

LMAO =))

n/a

I agree with all except number 9. Viewers have other options.

n/a

What I meant was other sites. We viewers don't only come here.

Thanks Hun :) and as hosts we have other choices too but it's a great site with a lot of unique options (like forums and chat) and for the most part....really fun members and very few technical problems.

Yes you are correct, it is the only site with public forums.

better for your business if you tell who you are lol

Speaking out for most hosts that choose to work here :) I think many members do not understand that this is a biz for us and that we are here to follow the rules and guidelines and operate a biz.....not to just choose us based on our looks and expect us to do whatever they want for how much they want to pay. Personally I am not here to meet someone because how could I trust they wouldn't be on here looking for other girls all the time.....hehe

11.) I will always remember that I am working to please my customers within the rules of CC, my category and within my limits and interests.

13) My overhead costs to include the gym, sexy clothes and shoes, facials, tanning, botox, implants, makeup, hair and pampering myself and my CC fees shall all be covered by my service fees so that I at least break even and please my members so they drool and cum!

12) I will read numbers 11) and 13) over and over!

You're smoking way too much crack

n/a

That is exactly what I do.
Well... except number 3) should read: "Give her 20 seconds to get fully naked and start masturbating."

Hhhhmmm that must be why all the hosts block you....it's your charm!

Devastating!

read some of the chathost profiles. there is your answer.

non nude

Well first you are assuming that what you consider "pretty", I also consider pretty. Second, even if I like a host's pics, I still must think her price is worth it based upon what I see in her pics, her category, and her profile. Some really hot hots are over $3,00/minute, and I typically avoid them.

To give one example, if I want nudity, and I see an instant action host with hot pics, I don't just jump into her room. I will check her price and make sure she is hot enough to justify that price. I will further check her rating, her comments, and personal forum.

There are a lot of hot hosts that have 3,5 or 4 stars for example. Well, if a host is that hot and not getting 4,5 or 5 stars, then she must be doing something wrong. Maybe has a boring show. Maybe she stalls. Maybe she is on 3 sites at once and ignoring members. I don't know. But whatever she is, it obviously isn't how she looks if she had hot pics so there is some type of a problem. I have a lot of problems with the rating system, but regardless of how well it works, anything below 4,5 stars is hit or miss in terms of havng a good time in my view as I have stated before, not that 4,5 or 5 stars guarantees anything.

And like I said, I will consider the category. If I think I will need to chat awhile with a little shy host before getting a show or I will need to go 121, I will often not be willing to pay as much per minute since it will take longer to get the show.

In sum, I basically have a mental checklist and way of evaluating whether I think a host will be worth seeing for that price. I usually make my decision in about 15 to 30 seconds. I just skim a couple of pics fast, check the price, check the stars, skim the profile, and skim her forum. It doesn't take long. If things look good, I might take a closer look at things for another 30 seconds and if all still is okay, jump into video or text. If not, I move on.

By the way, for me to even check out a profile, THE MAIN PROFILE PIC MUST BE A GOOD ONE!!! I don't think a lot of hosts understand this point.

credit limit,
income,
opportunity,
desperation.
actually the last one usually takes precedence over theothers!

n/a

original poster are you a cover girl?

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

If she isnt nice and friendly I dont care how good she looks, not going to visit.

n/a

there's some truth to that for sure. very sexy women can be intimidating.

a lot of ladies have pics of themselves where they have this ice-cold expression on their face, as is fashionable when posing for pics, but does not really make them look approachable.

the best legs and breasts i saw has Zlata555

n/a

Cant say I find any of those overly attractive. KittyBb is one whose looks I really like. But mostly for me concerning looks it is the face, must not be sharp, but soft and gentle features. Also to much makeup or at least when it is evident they use a lot of it turns me off too. RomanticCurl, GlamPrinces, and also ChocoTati are ones I think are very nice and beautiful women.

But all in all it comes down to personality that makes beauty for me, not physical looks. Though I find these women also very attractive physically.

n/a

The best figure I ever saw here was $500 as it was credited to my account in one of the competitions so so long ago :) and :(

n/a

n/a

dont forget yourself , your very beautiful too .

n/a

That is a tough question because I don't have just one particular favorite body type. I love tall slender, small busted with long skinny (but shapely) legs - eg: tenderkelly. Of course, a woman doesn't have to be tall and her legs don't have to be long to be sexy and misslovely1 is testament to this. I love her tiny sexy body. I also love curvy, big busted types - eg: sattine. Then there are the tall slender, large busted types like sexycaprize, but somehow small busted and curvy just don't attract me (i have no example for this type). Hope this helps.

Yess..I look forward..
Im old enough to remember Argentina´s fantastico entertainment from World Cup 1978.. Since than i allways follow Argentina..

n/a

i'll have one eye on argentina as i drew them in work lottery to win world cup, my other glass eye will be on england (even if they are boring and crap)

n/a

I will be following Argentina for a couple of reasons, Lionel Messi, Not knowing what Maradona will do next (not play Messi as he's worried about Messi outshining Maradona) and I had some of the best times ever in Argentina, fabulous country and people

n/a

i thought messi was spanish. weird.

n/a

Barca payed for his growth hormone treatment when he was a kid, and flew all his family over to be with him when, no wonder he lover it there so much.
Argentina'78 was the first world cup I remember, Mario Kempes and the most tickertape you've ever seen, but well before your time Capric0rn. Would be great to have another world cup there, fantastic place, best beef anywahere and bottles and bottles of Quilmes

n/a

Vamos, vamos Argentina....
Argentina has a great chance to win it all...I will be watching tomorrow morning. I will be in Buenos Aires for the quater finals, semi finals and the finals. I want to party around the obelisco on 9 de Julio and watch Maradona run around it naked after Argentina wins...again.

n/a

Im with France, England and South Africa (after todays game, how they dance that cute "goal dance" is just sooooooooooo cool:) But i think Spain will be the champion))))

n/a

n/a

Yep France has a very VERY very bad coach, and they just cant wait for this World Cup to be over, cuz when it is, the new one will sign the contract, and this one shitted all their reputation((

Makes Thierry Henry's handball even harder to take now for us Irish fans watching absolute sh1te like that

Yeah i know the feeling...The fact that Russia didnt get there cuz of that absolutely not fair game with Slovenia breaks my heart, but thats life..Sure it wasnt THAT obvious in our case as it was in urs, but it was still sooo...heartbreaking.

I just hope that France will get back on the horse after this "coach" leaves, they need a good leader, who they respect and follow. Great team but no leader, esp after Zidane has retired((

Getting shot of him after world cup for Laurent Blanc, so should be back to the top of the tree, he's class and has respect.
Talking of Russia, got them in the qualifiers for Euro 2012, so apprehensive about going back to Moscow, had some problems there last time, they didn't seem to like Ireland for some reason

n/a

Yeah i know but i dont support them))) For some reason i hate Spanish and Italian teams)) No offence guys))

As long as Maradroga is at the helm picking his buddies instead of the best, i don't see Argentina winning any major competition at all. Even Messi seems lost in the middle of that lame excuse that they call a team...

As for me, it's Portugal and once we're out (that shouldn't take too long lol) i'll support Brasil, Spain and pretty much everyone who plays against France and England.

Cmon((((((((( Are u my friend or what?(((((((

As for Portugal, cant stand just one single person in there...I think u know who lol))

n/a